Main Content

CWE Rule 372

Incomplete Internal State Distinction

Since R2024a

Description

Rule Description

The product does not properly determine which state it is in, causing it to assume it is in state X when in fact it is in state Y, causing it to perform incorrect operations in a security-relevant manner.

Polyspace Implementation

The rule checker checks for these issues:

  • Context initialized incorrectly for cryptographic operation

  • Context initialized incorrectly for digest operation

  • Incompatible padding for RSA algorithm operation

  • Inconsistent cipher operations

  • Missing cipher data to process

  • Missing cipher final step

  • Missing data for encryption, decryption or signing operation

  • Missing parameters for key generation

Examples

expand all

Issue

This issue occurs when you initialize an EVP_PKEY_CTX object for a specific public key cryptography operation but use the object for a different operation.

For instance, you initialize the context for encryption.

ret = EVP_PKEY_encrypt_init(ctx);
However, you use the context for decryption without reinitializing the context.
ret = EVP_PKEY_decrypt(ctx, out, &out_len, in, in_len);

The checker detects if the context object used in these functions has been initialized by using the corresponding initialization functions: EVP_PKEY_paramgen, EVP_PKEY_keygen, EVP_PKEY_encrypt, EVP_PKEY_verify, EVP_PKEY_verify_recover,EVP_PKEY_decrypt, EVP_PKEY_sign, EVP_PKEY_derive,and EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer.

Risk

Mixing up different operations on the same context can lead to obscure code. It is difficult to determine at a glance whether the current object is used for encryption, decryption, signature, or another operation. The mixup can also lead to a failure in the operation or unexpected ciphertext.

Fix

After you set up a context for a certain family of operations, use the context for only that family of operations.For instance, use these pairs of functions for initialization and usage of the EVP_PKEY_CTX context object.

  • For encryption with EVP_PKEY_encrypt, initialize the context with EVP_PKEY_encrypt_init.

  • For signature verification with EVP_PKEY_verify, initialize the context with EVP_PKEY_verify_init.

  • For key generation with EVP_PKEY_keygen, initialize the context with EVP_PKEY_keygen_init.

If you want to reuse an existing context object for a different family of operations, reinitialize the context.

Example — Encryption Using Context Initialized for Decryption
#include <openssl/evp.h>

#define fatal_error() exit(-1)

int ret;
unsigned char *out_buf10;
size_t out_len10;
int func(unsigned char *src, size_t len, EVP_PKEY_CTX *ctx){
  if (ctx == NULL) fatal_error(); 

  ret = EVP_PKEY_decrypt_init(ctx); 
  if (ret <= 0) fatal_error();
  return EVP_PKEY_encrypt(ctx, out_buf10, &out_len10, src, len); //Noncompliant
}

In this example, the context is initialized for decryption but used for encryption.

Correction — Use One Family of Operations

One possible correction is to initialize the object for encryption.

#include <openssl/evp.h>

#define fatal_error() exit(-1)

int ret;
unsigned char *out_buf10;
size_t out_len10;
int func(unsigned char *src, size_t len, EVP_PKEY_CTX *ctx){
  if (ctx == NULL) fatal_error(); 

  ret = EVP_PKEY_encrypt_init(ctx); 
  if (ret <= 0) fatal_error();
  return EVP_PKEY_encrypt(ctx, out_buf10, &out_len10, src, len);
}
Issue

This issue occurs when you initialize an EVP_MD_CTX context object for a specific digest operation but use the context for a different operation.

For instance, you initialize the context for creating a message digest only.

ret = EVP_DigestInit(ctx, EVP_sha256())
However, you perform a final step for signing:
ret = EVP_SignFinal(&ctx, out, &out_len, pkey);
The error is shown only if the final step is not consistent with the initialization of the context. If the intermediate update steps are inconsistent, it does not trigger an error because the intermediate steps do not depend on the nature of the operation. For instance, EVP_DigestUpdate works identically to EVP_SignUpdate.

Risk

Mixing up different operations on the same context can lead to obscure code. It is difficult to determine at a glance whether the current object is used for message digest creation, signing, or verification. The mixup can also lead to a failure in the operation or unexpected message digest.

Fix

After you set up a context for a certain family of operations, use the context for only that family of operations. For instance, use these pairs of functions for initialization and final steps.

  • EVP_DigestInit : EVP_DigestFinal

  • EVP_DigestInit_ex : EVP_DigestFinal_ex

  • EVP_DigestSignInit : EVP_DigestSignFinal

If you want to reuse an existing context object for a different family of operations, reinitialize the context.

Example — Inconsistent Initial and Final Digest Operation
#include <openssl/evp.h>

#define fatal_error() exit(-1)

int ret;
unsigned char *out_buf16;
unsigned int out_len16;

void func(unsigned char *src, size_t len){
  EVP_MD_CTX* ctx = EVP_MD_CTX_create();

  ret = EVP_SignInit_ex(ctx, EVP_sha256(), NULL);
  if (ret != 1) fatal_error();

  ret = EVP_SignUpdate(ctx, src, len);
  if (ret != 1) fatal_error();

  ret = EVP_DigestSignFinal(ctx, out_buf16, (size_t*) out_len16); //Noncompliant

  if (ret != 1) fatal_error();
}

In this example, the context object is initialized for signing only with EVP_SignInit but the final step attempts to create a signed digest with EVP_DigestSignFinal.

Correction — Use One Family of Operations

One possible correction is to use the context object for signing only. Change the final step to EVP_SignFinal in keeping with the initialization step.

#include <openssl/evp.h>

#define fatal_error() exit(-1)

int ret;
unsigned char *out_buf16;
unsigned int out_len16;

void corrected_cryptomdbadfunction(unsigned char *src, size_t len, EVP_PKEY* pkey){
  EVP_MD_CTX* ctx = EVP_MD_CTX_create();

  ret = EVP_SignInit_ex(ctx, EVP_sha256(), NULL); 
  if (ret != 1) fatal_error();

  ret = EVP_SignUpdate(ctx, src, len);
  if (ret != 1) fatal_error();

  ret = EVP_SignFinal(ctx, out_buf16, &out_len16, pkey); 
  if (ret != 1) fatal_error();
}
Issue

This issue occurs when you perform an RSA algorithm operation on a context object that is not compatible with the padding previously associated with the object.

For instance, you associate the OAEP padding scheme with a context object but later use the context for signature verification, an operation that the padding scheme does not support.

ret = EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_padding(ctx, RSA_PKCS1_OAEP_PADDING);
...
ret = EVP_PKEY_verify(ctx, out, out_len, in, in_len);

Risk

Padding schemes remove determinism from the RSA algorithm and protect RSA operations from certain kinds of attack.

When you use an incorrect padding scheme, the RSA operation can fail or result in unexpected ciphertext.

Fix

Before performing an RSA operation, associate the context object with a padding scheme that is compatible with the operation.

  • Encryption: Use the OAEP padding scheme.

    For instance, use the EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_padding function with the argument RSA_PKCS1_OAEP_PADDING or the RSA_padding_add_PKCS1_OAEP function.

    ret = EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_padding(ctx, RSA_PKCS1_OAEP_PADDING);
    
    You can also use the PKCS#1v1.5 or SSLv23 schemes. Be aware that these schemes are considered insecure.

    You can then use functions such as EVP_PKEY_encrypt / EVP_PKEY_decrypt or RSA_public_encrypt / RSA_private_decrypt on the context.

  • Signature: Use the RSA-PSS padding scheme.

    For instance, use the EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_padding function with the argument RSA_PKCS1_PSS_PADDING.

    ret = EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_padding(ctx, RSA_PKCS1_PSS_PADDING);
    You can also use the ANSI X9.31, PKCS#1v1.5, or SSLv23 schemes. Be aware that these schemes are considered insecure.

    You can then use functions such as the EVP_PKEY_sign-EVP_PKEY_verify pair or the RSA_private_encrypt-RSA_public_decrypt pair on the context.

If you perform two kinds of operation with the same context, after the first operation, reset the padding scheme in the context before the second operation.

Example — OAEP Padding for Signature Operation
#include <stddef.h>
#include <openssl/rsa.h>

#define fatal_error() exit(-1)

int ret;
unsigned char *out_buf;

int func(unsigned char *src, size_t len, RSA* rsa){
  if (rsa == NULL) fatal_error();
  return RSA_private_encrypt(len, src, out_buf, rsa, RSA_PKCS1_OAEP_PADDING); //Noncompliant
}

In this example, the function RSA_private_encrypt performs a signature operation by using the OAEP padding scheme, which supports encryption operations only.

Correction — Use Padding Scheme That Supports Signature

One possible correction is to use the RSA-PSS padding scheme. The corrected example uses the function RSA_padding_add_PKCS1_PSS to associate the padding scheme with the context.

#include <stddef.h>
#include <openssl/evp.h>
#include <openssl/rsa.h>

#define fatal_error() exit(-1)

int ret;
unsigned char *msg_pad;
unsigned char *out_buf;

int func(unsigned char *src, size_t len, RSA* rsa){
  if (rsa == NULL) fatal_error(); 

  ret = RSA_padding_add_PKCS1_PSS(rsa, msg_pad, src, EVP_sha256(), -2); 
  if (ret <= 0) fatal_error();

  return RSA_private_encrypt(len, msg_pad, out_buf, rsa, RSA_NO_PADDING); 
}
Issue

This issue occurs when you perform an encryption and decryption step with the same cipher context. You do not reinitialize the context in between those steps. The checker applies to symmetric encryption only.

For instance, you set up a cipher context for decryption using EVP_DecryptInit_ex.

EVP_DecryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
However, you use the context for encryption using EVP_EncryptUpdate.
EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, out_buf, &out_len, src, len); 

Risk

Mixing up encryption and decryption steps can lead to obscure code. It is difficult to determine at a glance whether the current cipher context is used for encryption or decryption. The mixup can also lead to race conditions, failed encryption, and unexpected ciphertext.

Fix

After you set up a cipher context for a certain family of operations, use the context for only that family of operations.

For instance, if you set up a cipher context for decryption using EVP_DecryptInit_ex, use the context afterward for decryption only.

Example — Encryption Step Following Decryption Step


#include <openssl/evp.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

/* Using the cryptographic routines */

unsigned char *out_buf;
int out_len;
unsigned char g_key[16];
unsigned char g_iv[16];
void func(unsigned char* src, int len) {
    
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx = EVP_CIPHER_CTX_new();
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(ctx);
    
    /* Cipher context set up for decryption*/
    EVP_DecryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, g_key, g_iv);

    /* Update step for encryption */
    EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, out_buf, &out_len, src, len);         //Noncompliant
}

In this example, the cipher context ctx is set up for decryption using EVP_DecryptInit_ex. However, immediately afterward, the context is used for encryption using EVP_EncryptUpdate.

Correction — Change Setup Step

One possible correction is to change the setup step. If you want to use the cipher context for encryption, set it up using EVP_EncryptInit_ex.


#include <openssl/evp.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

unsigned char *out_buf;
int out_len;
unsigned char g_key[16];
unsigned char g_iv[16];

void func(unsigned char* src, int len) {
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx = EVP_CIPHER_CTX_new();
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(ctx);

    /* Cipher context set up for encryption*/
    EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, g_key, g_iv);

    /* Update step for encryption */
    EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, out_buf, &out_len, src, len);        
}
Issue

This issue occurs when you perform the final step of a block cipher encryption or decryption incorrectly.

For instance, you do one of the following:

  • You do not perform update steps for encrypting or decrypting the data before performing a final step.

    /* Initialization of cipher context */
    ret = EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
    ...
    /* Missing update step */
    ...
    /* Final step */
    ret = EVP_EncryptFinal_ex(ctx, out_buf, &out_len);
  • You perform consecutive final steps without intermediate initialization and update steps.

    /* Initialization of cipher context */
    ret = EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
    ...
    /* Update step(s) */
    ret = EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, out_buf, &out_len, src, len);
    ...
    /* Final step */
    ret = EVP_EncryptFinal_ex(ctx, out_buf, &out_len);
    ...
    /* Missing initialization and update */
    ...
    /* Second final step */
    ret = EVP_EncryptFinal_ex(ctx, out_buf, &out_len);
  • You perform a cleanup of the cipher context and then perform a final step.

    /* Initialization of cipher context */
    ret = EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
    ...
    /* Update step(s) */
    ret = EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, out_buf, &out_len, src, len);
    ...
    /* Cleanup of cipher context */
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup(ctx);
    ...
    /* Second final step */
    ret = EVP_EncryptFinal_ex(ctx, out_buf, &out_len);

Risk

Block ciphers break your data into blocks of fixed size. During encryption or decryption, the update step encrypts or decrypts your data in blocks. Any leftover data is encrypted or decrypted by the final step. The final step adds padding to the leftover data so that it occupies one block, and then encrypts or decrypts the padded data.

If you perform the final step before performing the update steps, or perform the final step when there is no data to process, the behavior is undefined. You can also encounter run-time errors.

Fix

Perform encryption or decryption in this sequence:

  • Initialization of cipher context

  • Update steps

  • Final step

  • Cleanup of context

Example — Missing Update Steps for Encryption Before Final Step

#include <openssl/evp.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define SIZE16 16

unsigned char *out_buf;
int out_len;
unsigned char key[SIZE16];
unsigned char iv[SIZE16];

void func(void) {
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx = EVP_CIPHER_CTX_new();
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(ctx);

    /* Initialization of cipher context */
    EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
    
    /* Missing update steps for encryption */
    
    /* Final encryption step */
    EVP_EncryptFinal_ex(ctx, out_buf, &out_len);            //Noncompliant
}

In this example, after the cipher context is initialized, there are no update steps for encrypting the data. The update steps are supposed to encrypt one or more blocks of data, leaving the final step to encrypt data that is left over in a partial block. If you perform the final step without previous update steps, the behavior is undefined.

Correction — Perform Update Steps for Encryption Before Final Step

Perform update steps for encryption before the final step. In the corrected code below, the routine EVP_EncryptUpdate performs the update steps.


#include <openssl/evp.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define SIZE16 16

unsigned char *out_buf;
int out_len;
unsigned char key[SIZE16];
unsigned char iv[SIZE16];

void func(unsigned char *src, int len) {
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx = EVP_CIPHER_CTX_new();
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(ctx);

    /* Initialization of cipher context */
    EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
    
    /* Update steps for encryption */
    EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, out_buf, &out_len, src, len);   
    
    /* Final encryption step */
    EVP_EncryptFinal_ex(ctx, out_buf, &out_len);           
}
Issue

This issue occurs when you do not perform a final step after your update steps for encrypting or decrypting data.

For instance, you do the following:

/* Initialization of cipher context */
ret = EVP_EncryptInit_ex(&ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
...
/* Update step */
ret = EVP_EncryptUpdate(&ctx, out_buf, &out_len, src, len);
...
/* Missing final step */
...
/* Cleanup of cipher context */
EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup(ctx);

Risk

Block ciphers break your data into blocks of fixed size. During encryption or decryption, the update step encrypts or decrypts your data in blocks. Any leftover data is encrypted or decrypted by the final step. The final step adds padding to the leftover data so that it occupies one block, and then encrypts or decrypts the padded data.

If you do not perform the final step, leftover data remaining in a partial block is not encrypted or decrypted. You can face incomplete or unexpected output.

Fix

After your update steps for encryption or decryption, perform a final step to encrypt or decrypt leftover data.

/* Initialization of cipher context */
ret = EVP_EncryptInit_ex(&ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
...
/* Update step(s) */
ret = EVP_EncryptUpdate(&ctx, out_buf, &out_len, src, len);
...
/* Final step */
ret = EVP_EncryptFinal_ex(&ctx, out_buf, &out_len);
...
/* Cleanup of cipher context */
EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup(ctx);
Example — Cleanup of Cipher Context Before Final Step

#include <openssl/evp.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define SIZE16 16

unsigned char *out_buf;
int out_len;
unsigned char key[SIZE16];
unsigned char iv[SIZE16];

void func(unsigned char *src, int len) {
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx = EVP_CIPHER_CTX_new();
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(ctx);

    /* Initialization of cipher context */
    EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
    
    /* Update steps for encryption */
    EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, out_buf, &out_len, src, len);   
    
    /* Missing final encryption step */
    
    /* Cleanup of cipher context */
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup(ctx);  //Noncompliant
}

In this example, the cipher context ctx is cleaned up before a final encryption step. The final step is supposed to encrypt leftover data. Without the final step, the encryption is incomplete.

Correction — Perform Final Encryption Step

After your update steps for encryption, perform a final encryption step to encrypt leftover data. In the corrected code below, the routine EVP_EncryptFinal_ex is used to perform this final step.


#include <openssl/evp.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define SIZE16 16

unsigned char *out_buf;
int out_len;
unsigned char key[SIZE16];
unsigned char iv[SIZE16];

void func(unsigned char *src, int len) {
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx = EVP_CIPHER_CTX_new();
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(ctx);

    /* Initialization of cipher context */
    EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
    
    /* Update steps for encryption */
    EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, out_buf, &out_len, src, len);   
    
    /* Final encryption step */
    EVP_EncryptFinal_ex(ctx, out_buf, &out_len);
    
    /* Cleanup of cipher context */
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup(ctx); 
}
Issue

This issue occurs when the data provided for an encryption, decryption, signing, or authentication operation is NULL or the data length is zero.

For instance, you unintentionally provide a NULL value for in or a zero value for in_len in this decryption operation:

ret = EVP_PKEY_decrypt(ctx, out, &out_len, in, in_len);
Or, you provide a NULL value for md or sig, or a zero value for md_len or sig_len in this verification operation:
ret = EVP_PKEY_verify(ctx, md, mdlen, sig, siglen);

Risk

With NULL data or zero length, the operation does not occur. The redundant operation often indicates a coding error.

Fix

Check the placement of the encryption, decryption, or signing operation. If the operation is intended to happen, make sure that the data provided is non-NULL. Set the data length to a nonzero value.

Example — Zero Data Length for Signing Operation
#include <openssl/evp.h>

#define fatal_error() exit(-1)

int ret;
int func(EVP_PKEY_CTX * ctx){
  if (ctx == NULL) fatal_error(); 
  unsigned char* sig = (unsigned char*) "0123456789";
  unsigned char* md = (unsigned char*) "0123456789";

  ret = EVP_PKEY_verify_init(ctx);
  if (ret <= 0) fatal_error();
  ret = EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_signature_md(ctx, EVP_sha256());
  if (ret <= 0) fatal_error();
  return EVP_PKEY_verify(ctx, sig, 0, md, 0);  //Noncompliant
}

In this example, the data lengths (third and fifth arguments to EVP_PKEY_verify) are zero. The operation fails.

Correction — Use Nonzero Data Length

One possible correction is to use a nonzero length for the signature and the data believed to be signed.

#include <openssl/evp.h>

#define fatal_error() exit(-1)

int ret;
int func(EVP_PKEY_CTX * ctx){
  if (ctx == NULL) fatal_error(); 
  unsigned char* sig = (unsigned char*) "0123456789";
  unsigned char* md = (unsigned char*) "0123456789";

  ret = EVP_PKEY_verify_init(ctx);
  if (ret <= 0) fatal_error();
  ret = EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_signature_md(ctx, EVP_sha256());
  if (ret <= 0) fatal_error();
  return EVP_PKEY_verify(ctx, sig, 10, md, 10); 
}
Issue

This issue occurs when you perform a key generation step with a context object without first associating the object with required parameters.

For instance, you associate a EVP_PKEY_CTX context object with an empty EVP_PKEY object params before key generation :

EVP_PKEY * params = EVP_PKEY_new();
...
EVP_PKEY_CTX * ctx = EVP_PKEY_CTX_new(params, NULL);
... 
EVP_PKEY_keygen(ctx, &pkey);

Risk

Without appropriate parameters, the key generation step does not occur. The redundant operation often indicates a coding error.

Fix

Check the placement of the key generation step. If the operation is intended, make sure that the parameters are set before key generation.

Certain algorithms use default parameters. For instance, if you specify the DSA algorithm when creating the EVP_PKEY_CTX object, a default key length of 1024 bits is used:

kctx = EVP_PKEY_CTX_new_id(EVP_PKEY_DSA, NULL);
Specifying the algorithm during context creation is sufficient to avoid this defect. Only if you use the Elliptic Curve (EC) algorithm, you must also specify the curve explicitly before key generation.

However, the default parameters can generate keys that are too weak for encryption. Weak parameters can trigger another defect. To change default parameters, use functions specific to the algorithm. For instance, to set parameters, you can use these functions:

  • Diffie-Hellman (DH): Use EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_dh_paramgen_prime_len and EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_dh_paramgen_generator.

  • Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA): Use EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_dsa_paramgen_bits.

  • RSA: Use EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_padding, EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_pss_saltlen, EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_rsa_keygen_bits, and EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_keygen_pubexp.

  • Elliptic curve (EC): Use EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_ec_paramgen_curve_nid and EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_ec_param_enc.

Example — Empty Parameters During Key Generation
#include <openssl/evp.h>

#define fatal_error() exit(-1)

int ret;
int func(EVP_PKEY *pkey){
  EVP_PKEY * params = EVP_PKEY_new();
  if (params == NULL) fatal_error();

  EVP_PKEY_CTX * ctx = EVP_PKEY_CTX_new(params, NULL);
  if (ctx == NULL) fatal_error();

  ret = EVP_PKEY_keygen_init(ctx);
  if (ret <= 0) fatal_error();
  return EVP_PKEY_keygen(ctx, &pkey); //Noncompliant
}

In this example, the context object ctx is associated with an empty parameter object params. The context object does not have the required parameters for key generation.

Correction — Specify Algorithm During Context Creation

One possible correction is to specify an algorithm, such as RSA, during context creation. For stronger encryption, use 2048 bits for key length instead of the default 1024 bits.

#include <openssl/evp.h>
#include <openssl/rsa.h>

#define fatal_error() exit(-1)

int ret;
int func(EVP_PKEY *pkey){
  EVP_PKEY_CTX * ctx = EVP_PKEY_CTX_new_id(EVP_PKEY_RSA, NULL); 
  if (ctx == NULL) fatal_error();

  ret = EVP_PKEY_keygen_init(ctx);
  if (ret <= 0) fatal_error();
  
  ret = EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_keygen_bits(ctx, 2048); 
  if (ret <= 0) fatal_error();
  
  return EVP_PKEY_keygen(ctx, &pkey); 
}

Check Information

Category: State Issues

Version History

Introduced in R2024a