It looks like the results are very close to being the same between column 1 and column 10:
>>[z;zf]
ans =
Columns 1 through 5
1.3869e-33 4.4739e-35 1.3981e-36 4.2366e-38 1.2461e-39
1.3869e-33 4.4739e-35 1.3981e-36 4.2366e-38 1.2461e-39
Columns 6 through 10
3.5602e-41 9.8894e-43 2.6728e-44 7.0337e-46 1.8035e-47
3.5602e-41 9.8894e-43 2.6728e-44 7.0339e-46 1.8056e-47
Columns 11 through 15
4.5088e-49 1.0997e-50 2.6183e-52 6.0892e-54 1.3839e-55
4.1885e-49 -2.3624e-50 -1.1036e-50 -2.1899e-50 -2.3753e-50
Columns 16 through 20
3.0753e-57 6.6855e-59 1.4225e-60 2.9634e-62 6.0478e-64
-2.0649e-50 -2.2115e-50 -2.5909e-50 -2.2244e-50 -1.1036e-50
Columns 21 through 25
1.2096e-65 2.3717e-67 4.561e-69 8.6056e-71 1.5936e-72
-3.1556e-50 -3.259e-50 2.108e-50 1.8364e-50 -3.9725e-50
Columns 26 through 30
2.8975e-74 5.1741e-76 9.0774e-78 1.5651e-79 2.6527e-81
-1.3752e-50 -1.0454e-50 -3.9014e-50 -1.3827e-50 -1.0139e-49
Column 31
4.4211e-83
7.1734e-50
If you look at difference in amplitude between column 1 and column 10 you will notice it is 14 orders of magnitude. It looks like the problem comes down to machine precision... if you have amplitudes that differ more than 14 orders of magnitude (~double precision) then you will start to see artifacts introduced.
