Kronecker Tensor Product for very large matrices

3 次查看(过去 30 天)
I need to build a 2D kronecker tensor product of with a size of approximately 10^6 x 10^6. The problem is that I get the following message:
%Out of memory. Type HELP MEMORY for your options.
Is there any way to get around this memory limitation? My code is posted below:
nx = 1000;ny = 1000; %Number of points along x and y
dx = 1/(nx-1);dy = 1/(ny-1); %Spacing between each point
diag_block = eye(ny-1) * (-2/dx^2-2/dy^2); %Identity Matrix of ny-1 points
diag_block = diag_block + diag(ones(ny-2,1)/dy^2,1); %
diag_block = sparse(diag_block) + sparse(diag(ones(ny-2,1)/dy^2,-1)); %
Matrix = kron(sparse(eye(nx-1)),sparse(diag_block)); %Using sparse() made this line work
Matrix = Matrix + diag(ones((nx-2) * (ny-1),1)/dx^2, ny-1); %FAILS HERE!!!
Matrix = Matrix + diag(ones((nx-2) * (ny-1),1)/dx^2, -(ny-1)); %AND HERE!!!

采纳的回答

Matt J
Matt J 2021-7-16
编辑:Matt J 2021-7-16
You need the matrices generated by diag() in sparse form, too. Use spdiags() instead, e.g.,
nx = 3;ny =3; dx=1; %Number of points along x and y
Qfull=diag(ones((nx-2) * (ny-1),1)/dx^2, ny-1)
Qfull = 4×4
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bin=[0;0;ones((nx-2) * (ny-1),1)/dx^2];
Q=spdiags(Bin,ny-1,4,4)
Q =
(1,3) 1 (2,4) 1
full(Q)
ans = 4×4
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  4 个评论
William Kett
William Kett 2021-7-18
Ah! So when I create A and B using spdiags(), I am instead getting a scalar instead of getting a matrix and by adding a scalar to the Matrix, I guess it fills in the empty space and creates a non-sparse matrix? I did not change my arguments or the order in which I passed them in from when I changed from diag() to spdiags().
Could this be why?
Changing nx = ny = 4 yields the following Matrix:
Matrix =
-36 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0
9 -36 9 0 9 0 0 0 0
0 9 -36 0 0 9 0 0 0
9 0 0 -36 9 0 9 0 0
0 9 0 9 -36 9 0 9 0
0 0 9 0 9 -36 0 0 9
0 0 0 9 0 0 -36 9 0
0 0 0 0 9 0 9 -36 9
0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 -36
and converting that to sparse by running sparse(Matrix) yields:
ans =
(1,1) -36
(2,1) 9
(4,1) 9
(1,2) 9
(2,2) -36
(3,2) 9
(5,2) 9
(2,3) 9
(3,3) -36
(6,3) 9
(1,4) 9
(4,4) -36
(5,4) 9
(7,4) 9
(2,5) 9
(4,5) 9
(5,5) -36
(6,5) 9
(8,5) 9
(3,6) 9
(5,6) 9
(6,6) -36
(9,6) 9
(4,7) 9
(7,7) -36
(8,7) 9
(5,8) 9
(7,8) 9
(8,8) -36
(9,8) 9
(6,9) 9
(8,9) 9
(9,9) -36
So, I know that I am supposed to be getting a non-scalar result for my A and B, so it's hopefully the case that I just input my arguments incorrectly.
Matt J
Matt J 2021-7-18
编辑:Matt J 2021-7-18
Could this be why?
Yes, you should review the documentation for spdiags() and/or re-examine the example I gave. you It's syntax is very different from that of diag().

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(0 个)

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Sparse Matrices 的更多信息

产品


版本

R2020a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by