How to order values within a cell array more efficiently??

4 次查看（过去 30 天）
Antonio Espana
Antonio Espana 2013-11-14
评论： Antonio Espana 2013-11-15
I have a 3x12 cell array called "ratings"
ratings= {'AAA','AA','A','A-','BBB-','BB+','BB','BB-','B+','B','B-','CCC+';
'A','A-','AA','AAA','B','B+','B-','BB','BB+','BB-','BBB-','CCC+';
1,1,1,3,11,16,18,1,1,17,16,14};
  • The first row of the array has the ratings in the desired order
  • The second row has the ratings disordered
  • The third row contains a number associated with the ratings in the second row
I wrote the following code:
orderedratings=cell(1,length(ratings))
for i=1:length(ratings);
for j=1:length(ratings)
if strcmp(ratings(1,i),ratings(2,j))==1
orderedratings(i)=ratings(3,j);
end
end
end
and it allows me to reorder the third row in respect to the ordered first row, such that:
orderedratings={1,6,8,2,18,3,1,21,17,12,10,1}
Is there a way to do the same more efficiently, or another way without "for" conditionals?? It is very much appreciated a different appoach.
Antonio Espana
  2 个评论
Ben Petschel
Ben Petschel 2013-11-15
If I run your code I get a different result:
orderedratings = { 3, 1, 1, 1, 16, 1, 1, 17, 16, 11, 18, 14}
Not sure how you obtained {1,6,8,...}
Antonio Espana
Antonio Espana 2013-11-15
Hi Ben thanks for the heads up, you are right the result i wrote is completely wrong and your result is the right one. It is not a problem with the code but a blunder on my side cause i wrote the result of a different ratings array.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Ben Petschel
Ben Petschel 2013-11-15
The following should work regardless of the ordering of the two rows:
[~,idx] = ismember(ratings(1,:),ratings(2,:));
orderedratings = ratings(3,idx)
  1 个评论
Antonio Espana
Antonio Espana 2013-11-15
Hi Ben
Also tested this code and is very fast and elegant, with all this ideas i can get rid of a lot of conditionals thanks.
Antonio

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（3 个）

Simon
Simon 2013-11-14
Hi!
orderedratings = cellfun(@(x) ratings{3,x}, ...
cellfun(@(x) strcmp(x,ratings(2,:)), ratings(1,:), 'UniformOutput', false));
It takes about 2/3 of the time, but it is not very easy to read ...
  7 个评论
显示 5更早的评论
Simon
Simon 2013-11-15
orderedratings{1,7} is a 1x2 cell because the 7th element in the first row of ratings 'BB' is found in the 8th and 10th element of the second row, while the 8th element in the first row of ratings 'BB-' wasn't found at all in the second row. Great, isn't it? ;-)
Antonio Espana
Antonio Espana 2013-11-15
Thank you very much i overlooked the fact that your example had two cells with the same value whereas my normal ratings arrays never have repeated values. Now, that could be useful way to control my arrays hehe.
Antonio

请先登录，再进行评论。

Azzi Abdelmalek
Azzi Abdelmalek 2013-11-14
编辑：Azzi Abdelmalek 2013-11-15
[~,~,idx]=unique(ratings(1,:));
out=ratings(3,idx)
ADD
If the second row is not sorted
[idx2,idx2]=sort(ratings(2,:));
[~,~,idx12]=unique(ratings(1,:));
idx12=idx2(idx12);
out=ratings(3,idx12);
  5 个评论
显示 3更早的评论
Antonio Espana
Antonio Espana 2013-11-15
Silly me now i get what you mean by sorted, my second row is always sorted because is the result of another implementation of the unique function in another part of my code, i scrambled the second row a bit and with the ADD code still manages to work. Thanks
Antonio

请先登录，再进行评论。

Azzi Abdelmalek
Azzi Abdelmalek 2013-11-15
In case the second row is not sorted
[idx1,idx1]=sort(ratings(1,:));
[idx2,idx2]=sort(ratings(2,:));
[kk,kk]=sort(idx2);
[idx,idx]=sort(idx1(kk));
orderedratings = ratings(3,idx);%
  3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论
Azzi Abdelmalek
Azzi Abdelmalek 2013-11-15
After speed test, this code seems slightly faster then my previous answer

请先登录，再进行评论。

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Hypothesis Tests 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by