Loop that I am trying to get rid off

1 次查看(过去 30 天)
To follow up on my previous thread regarding a very time consuming routine, the main source of slowness I believe is the following: Rating agencies such as Moody and Standard and Poors report ratings for bonds outstanding. This rating changes from time to time. So I have in a matrix X0: column 1 is a bond ID Column 2 is the rating beginning date Column 3 is the rating Column 4 is the rating ending date for example for Bond ID 1 I have the following inputs: Ratings=[1 726834 3 728000;1 728000 2 729500;1 729500 3 731000]; then I have a vector date of 20 year daily data so I am running a loop that looks like this for a single bond (I have 15000 bonds):
for i=1:length(date)
x1=find(X0(:,2)<=date(i) & X0(:,4)>date(i));
if isempty(x1)
R(i)=nan;%Rating
else R(i)=X0(x1,3);
end
end
Is there a way to get rid of this loop ?

采纳的回答

Oleg Komarov
Oleg Komarov 2011-8-6
% Preallocate R already with NaNs
R = NaN(size(date));
% Now we want to test how many dates belong to each rating period, to do this construct the edges of each period
edges = unique(X0(:,[2,4]));
% Total length or rating history (excluded last day of last period)
idx = date >= edges(1) & date < edges(end);
% Count ho many dates fall per period (last bucket is last day of last rating period, which is excluded)
len = histc(date, edges);
% Use run-length decoding (vectirized)
R(idx) = rude(len(1:end-1), X0(:,3));
Rude on FEX: here
  3 个评论
joseph Frank
joseph Frank 2011-8-6
thanks. I eliminated the duplication

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(2 个)

Fangjun Jiang
Fangjun Jiang 2011-8-6
I wonder if you can use interp1(). Basically, it is a look up operation, right? It will fill NaNs for dates outside of Ratings. But there should be no gap of dates in Ratings.
Use your own discretion. BTW, don't use 'date' as the variable name. It's a function.
Ratings=[1 726834 3 728000;1 728000 2 729500;1 729500 3 731000];
X=[Ratings(:,2),Ratings(:,4)-1]';
X=X(:);
Y=[Ratings(:,3),Ratings(:,3)]';
Y=Y(:);
Dates=726830:731005;
R=interp1(X,Y,Dates,'nearest');

Daniel Shub
Daniel Shub 2011-8-6
Loops in MATLAB are much faster nowadays then they used to be. Without timing solutions, it is not always obvious what way is fastest. Sometimes you just want to get to fast enough.
It looks to me like you could loop over the rows of X0 instead of the dates.

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Dates and Time 的更多信息

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by