Euclidian distance showing different result for different formula

3 次查看(过去 30 天)
d = (query_feature' - train_feature').^2; % Eucledian distance
d_1 = sqrt(sum((query_feature' - train_feature') .^ 2))
The method with d is giving some error in retrieval, but when using d_1 it always give 100% accurate retrival (all retrieved images are similar as query image)
What can be wrong? Any suggestions appreciated.
  2 个评论
Image Analyst
Image Analyst 2021-12-29
编辑:Image Analyst 2021-12-29
Not sure what is wrong. Can you attach your data?
d is a list of the squared differences, while d_1 is the root mean square - a single number and a different thing. Not sure what you're expecting. The only way d or d_1 would be zero (meaning no differences and 100% accuracy) would be if query_feature exaclty equaled train_feature. Is that the case?
new_user
new_user 2021-12-29
编辑:new_user 2021-12-29
db = 'CBIR';
[fn, pn] = uigetfile(db);
im = fullfile(pn, fn);
outputFlder = fullfile('Test'); %returns full path of last arugument
rootFolder = fullfile(outputFlder); %variable storing path
images_query = imageDatastore(rootFolder, 'IncludeSubfolders',true, 'LabelSource','foldernames'); %%'ReadFcn', @readCBIR
%R = imread("99 (5).jpeg"); % Read image
R = imread(im); % Read image
Input_Layer_Size_q = net.Layers(1).InputSize(1:2); % (1:2 = 1st 2 elemnts of input size), input layer size stored in this variable (Input_layer_size)
Resized_Test_image_q = augmentedImageDatastore(Input_Layer_Size_q, R, 'ColorPreprocessing','gray2rgb'); %% For defining test image replace "Testing _image with test folder
%Extract feature
train_feature = activations(net, Resized_Training_image, 'Animal Feature Learner', 'OutputAs', 'Rows');
query_feature = activations(net, Resized_Test_image_q, 'Animal Feature Learner', 'OutputAs', 'Rows');
%Equation 2
a = query_feature; % transposing
b = transpose(1-a);
%Equation 3
c = zeros(Number_of_Classes,Number_of_Training_images);
d = (query_feature' - train_feature').^2; % Eucledian distance
% d = sqrt(sum((query_feature' - train_feature') .^ 2)); % other method eucledian: giving all images from same category maybe something is wrong
for e = 1 : Number_of_Training_images
f = b.*d(:,e);
c(:, e) = f;
end
c = sqrt(sum(c))';
% Fetch top 25 similar images
g = sort(c);
[~, n] = sort(c);
n = n(1:50);
files = cell(1, 50);
for h =1:50
files{h} = Training_image.Files{n(h)};
end
%Display query image
figure;
imshow(R);
title('query')
% Display retrived images
figure;
montage(files);
title("retrived")

请先登录,再进行评论。

回答(2 个)

John D'Errico
John D'Errico 2021-12-29
What you write in d is simply not Euclidean distance What can be wrong? Your belief that it is so? What you write in d1 IS a Euclidean distance computation, so that it works should be no surprise.
  1 个评论
new_user
new_user 2021-12-29
but giving all the time 100% retrival accuracy using pretrained CNN is ok?
I mean I am using pretrained CNN to extract features and then measuing the similarity between them using d & d_1. So, the result for d_1 are 100% always.

请先登录,再进行评论。


Meg Noah
Meg Noah 2021-12-29
Some code - look at the sizes of the arrays to see why:
nsamples = 25;
ncomponents = 4;
s = RandStream('dsfmt19937','Seed',1123581321);
query_feature = rand(s,nsamples,ncomponents);
train_feature = rand(s,1,ncomponents);
% relative vector between query vectors and training vector
d = (query_feature' - train_feature').^2;
% Three ways to compute Eucledian distance between query vectors and a
% training vector
d_1 = sqrt(sum((query_feature' - train_feature') .^ 2))';
d_2 = sqrt(sum(bsxfun(@minus, query_feature, train_feature).^2,2));
d_3 = vecnorm((query_feature'-train_feature'),2)';
  2 个评论
Meg Noah
Meg Noah 2021-12-29
The code snippet above creates the distances as vectors - arrays that are nsamples in rows and with one column. What matrix deimension is your code expecting?

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Filter Banks 的更多信息

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by