Parallel rank calculation for sparse matrices -- suggestions?
8 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
I need to calculate the rank of large (> 1 terabyte of non-zero elements) sparse matrices with MATLAB. Exploring the Parallel Toolbox, but can't seem to find anything that convinces me what is offers will be helpful. If I'm wrong, can someone point me in the right direction? Ideally, I'd just want to take my existing code that has "r=sprank(A)" in it and have that library call run in parallel, perhaps with some additional annotation as needed. Would using a GPUARRAY help here, for example? Doesn't seem like it, but perhaps I'm wrong. Hoping someone here can help me out. Thanks!
Barry Fagin
Professor of Computer Science
barry.fagin@afacademy.af.edu
9 个评论
Matt J
2022-9-5
A = sparse(tall,skinny)
How tall? How skinny? What currently rules out the approach already discussed below of using rank(full(A.'*A))?
Bruno Luong
2022-9-6
"After doing a little digging, I now believe sprank() merely counts the number of non-zero columns. This is not what I require."
It does something more intelligent than that it match the row to column through Dulmange Mendelsohn permutation. In your case might be all the non-zero column can be matched. But that is exactly what structural rank means.
采纳的回答
Bruno Luong
2022-8-30
移动:Bruno Luong
2022-8-30
5 个评论
Bruno Luong
2022-8-31
IMO the doc should clarify this.
But then I still have some doubt. If user runs multiple sprank in parallel, it will take less worker to work on one sprank. So at the end do we really speed up the whole thing?
Edric Ellis
2022-9-1
Yes, the "extended capability" description could probably do with some refinement to make it clear exactly what works. (Today, there are a good number of MATLAB functions that cannot be run on a thread pool worker, and this "extended capability" really means simply that the function can run on a thread pool worker).
The performance situation is ... complicated, unfortunately. There is no single simple answer as to whether running N copies of a given function concurrently on workers is faster than running N copies sequentially on the client. It depends on all sorts of details of the implementation of that function - but primarily whether the function is already intrinsically multithreaded by MATLAB itself.
更多回答(2 个)
Bruno Luong
2022-9-5
For thin and tall sparse matrix A of size (m x n), m>>n and n in the order of 1000s, it might be possible to compute the rank using q-less qr, which is better than rank(A'*A) which has the drawback of square the condition number.
A=sprand(100000,10,0.1)*sprand(10,100,0.1);
R=qr(A,0);
rank(full(R))
0 个评论
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!