Create a function handle that is a sum of function handles

2 次查看(过去 30 天)
Goodmorning everyone,
I have the following points
POINTS=[0.0194358127458200 0.0125146090698240 0.0120324235527160 0.00761174198214000 0.00660775699279100 0.00381485098617300 0.00195617023840500 0.000824508358196000 0.00121681256884900 0.000390389885216000 0.000444315057222000 0;
0 0.000452782917043000 0.000395689955442000 0.00121172812659200 0.000829869449880000 0.00195546440425700 0.00381482017361200 0.00661064156533300 0.00762496776011900 0.0120411026638820 0.0125098828784870 0.0189137987850580];
I need to create a function handle as follows.
I know that the center of the circumference that approximates better those points is function of R, and is found in the point [R,R]. The approximation error is then:
error=@(R) abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,i),R-POINTS(2,i)])-R));
This for every point.
I want to create the function handle that is the sum of all the errors like:
1) totdist=@(R) error1+error2+error3+...
I can create a single function function manually by summing every error like:
2) totdist=@(R) abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,1),R-POINTS(2,1)])-R))+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,2),R-POINTS(2,2)])-R))+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,3),R-POINTS(2,3)])-R))+...
However when the number of points become large, I would like to create the summing function 1) authomatically without manually summing 100 times as in 2).
The function must be used with "fminsearch" afterwards.
Is there a way to achieve this?
Thanks in advance for the answer.

回答(3 个)

Bjorn Gustavsson
Bjorn Gustavsson 2023-1-13
Your specification is a bit ambiguous to me, but if I interpret it such that you want to fit a function such that:
(I've used the additional condition that and , but this one can be easily relaxed). You can make a general solution something like this:
f_x = @(R,theta,f_theta) R + f_theta(R,theta).*cos(theta);
f_y = @(R,theta,f_theta) R + f_theta(R,theta).*sin(theta);
err_fcn = @(R,X,Y,f_theta) sum( (X-f_x(R,atan2(Y-R,X-R),f_theta)).^2 + (Y-f_y(R,atan2(Y-R,X-R),f_theta)).^2);
f_theta = @(R,theta) R*ones(size(theta));
Rest = fminsearch(@(R) err_fcn(R,POINTS(1,:)',POINTS(2,:)',f_theta),20e-3);
This is a rather cumbersome way to make a simple circle-fitting-function, you will find multiple circle-fitting-functions on the file exchange: circle-fitting FEx contributions. If your circumference is a bit more complicated, even more complicated than an ellipse even, then you simply have to modify the f_theta function-handle accordingly. If the centre of the circumference is not exactly the same as the radius for example then you'll have to modify the above snippet a bit:
f_x = @(R,theta,f_theta) R(1) + f_theta(R(3),theta).*cos(theta);
f_y = @(R,theta,f_theta) R(2) + f_theta(R(3),theta).*sin(theta);
err_fcn = @(R,X,Y,f_theta) sum( (X-f_x(R,atan2(Y-R(2),X-R(1)),f_theta)).^2 + (Y-f_y(R,atan2(Y-R(2),X-R(1)),f_theta)).^2);
f_theta = @(R,theta) R*ones(size(theta));
Rest3 = fminsearch(@(R) err_fcn(R,POINTS(1,:)',POINTS(2,:)',f_theta),20e-3*[1 1 1]);
You can also allow for additional parameters to fit to, for example major and minor radius and angle of semi-major axis of an ellipse. But, this starts to become rather cluttered code for anonymous function-handles at this stage and somewhere here I tend to transition to proper matlab-functions in files, just to keep the code cleaner.
HTH
  2 个评论
Riccardo Mari
Riccardo Mari 2023-1-13
编辑:Riccardo Mari 2023-1-13
I try to explain better.
I have to measure the error in the distance as
error=@(R) abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,i),R-POINTS(2,i)])-R));
% This is the difference between the distance of the points to the centre
% of the circle (in the point [R,R]) and the radius R.
So I have to apply this to every point in the list. R is the radius of the circle. I want to find the radius that minimizes the total error. So I have
error1=@(R) abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,1),R-POINTS(2,1)])-R));
error2=@(R) abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,2),R-POINTS(2,2)])-R));
error3=@(R) abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,3),R-POINTS(2,3)])-R));
%And so on until the last one. In this case:
error12=@(R) abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,12),R-POINTS(2,12)])-R));
I have to use "fminsearch" with the sum of those errors. For twelve points, like in this case, I have to manually write:
totdist=@(R) (abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,1),R-POINTS(2,1)])-R)+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,2),R-POINTS(2,2)])-R)+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,3),R-POINTS(2,3)])-R)+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,4),R-POINTS(2,4)])-R)+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,5),R-POINTS(2,5)])-R)+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,6),R-POINTS(2,6)])-R)+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,7),R-POINTS(2,7)])-R)+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,8),R-POINTS(2,8)])-R)+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,9),R-POINTS(2,9)])-R)+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,10),R-POINTS(2,10)])-R)+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,11),R-POINTS(2,11)])-R)+abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,12),R-POINTS(2,12)])-R));
You see that is quite long to manually write, especially when the points number becomes large.
My question is if there is a way to generate all the error_n functions and then sum them to get the function handle totdist without writing manually every function, like using a for loop to generate each error function and the sum function to sum them together.
Hope it's clearer now.
Bjorn Gustavsson
Bjorn Gustavsson 2023-1-13
编辑:Bjorn Gustavsson 2023-1-13
That's what my first example does. For general circle-fitting functions follow the link to the good file-exchange contributions that solve that problem for the more general case.
HTH

请先登录,再进行评论。


Matt J
Matt J 2023-1-13
error=@(R) abs( vecnorm(POINTS-R) - R );
  1 个评论
Matt J
Matt J 2023-1-13
编辑:Matt J 2023-1-13
I have to measure the error in the distance as error=@(R) abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,i),R-POINTS(2,i)])-R)) .... So I have to apply this to every point in the list.
No, you do not have to implement a separate error function for every Point(:,i). There are vectorized functions which calculate all errors at once, which is what my answer has given you.
I want to find the radius that minimizes the total error.
If you know the center [x0,y0] of the circle already, the minimizing R is just the average of the empricial distances. There is no need for fminsearch.
R = mean(vecnorm(POINTS-[x0;y0]))

请先登录,再进行评论。


Riccardo Mari
Riccardo Mari 2023-1-13
Thanks everybody for the answers.
I'm sorry if I couldn't be clearer because I can't share too much abount the code and the project.
I used the solution proprosed here. To summarize, I did this:
N=length(POINTS);
f=cell(N,1);
for i=1:N
f{i}=@(R) abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,i),R-POINTS(2,i)])-R);
end
totdist=@(R) summer(f,R);
with:
function y=summer(f,R)
y=0;
for i=1:numel(f)
y=y+f{i}(R);
end
end
  1 个评论
Matt J
Matt J 2023-1-13
编辑:Matt J 2023-1-13
It's a bad solution. Very slow and inefficient. I urge you to reconsider the other proposals.
POINTS=rand(2,100000); R=0;
tic;
N=length(POINTS);
f=cell(N,1);
for i=1:N
f{i}=@(R) abs(norm([R-POINTS(1,i),R-POINTS(2,i)])-R);
end
totdist=@(R) summer(f,R);
version1=totdist(R); %calculation
toc;
Elapsed time is 0.279596 seconds.
tic
errorFcn=@(R) norm( vecnorm(POINTS-R) - R ,1);
version2=errorFcn(R);%calculation
toc
Elapsed time is 0.006358 seconds.
version1,version2 %same result
version1 = 7.6622e+04
version2 = 7.6622e+04

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Matched Filter and Ambiguity Function 的更多信息

标签

产品


版本

R2022a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by