nanmean giving nansum output

Question

Ralph Andrews 2023-2-13

0
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/1911565-nanmean-giving-nansum-output

评论： Ralph Andrews 2023-2-13

function 'nanmean' is behaving like nansum and I don't know why. the help command (image below) is also referencing nansum's functionality.

any ideas? i recently updated to 2022b..

0 个评论
显示 -2更早的评论隐藏 -2更早的评论

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

Answer 1

the cyclist 2023-2-13

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/1911565-nanmean-giving-nansum-output#answer_1170285

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

That's not the help I get for nanmean (in the Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox). Looks like there is a nanmean in the Financial Toolbox as well, but this seems like odd behavior.

Is it possible that nanmean points to a user-defined function instead? What output do you get from

which nanmean -all

1 个评论
显示 -1更早的评论隐藏 -1更早的评论

Ralph Andrews 2023-2-13

ahh yes, thank you, that's exactly what i needed to see.

looks like i had a few competing nanmean functions and i have now moved the toolbox/stats one up in the path :)

请先登录，再进行评论。

Answer 2

Matt J 2023-2-13

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/1911565-nanmean-giving-nansum-output#answer_1170280

移动：Matt J 2023-2-13

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

function 'nanmean' is behaving like nansum

In what way? Example?

i recently updated to 2022b..

If so, why use nanmean at all? As the documentation told you, it's obsolete. Instead, use

Y=mean(X,dim,'omitnan')

4 个评论
显示 2更早的评论隐藏 2更早的评论

the cyclist 2023-2-13

@Ralph Andrews, I would at least consider using the (officially recommended) syntax that @Matt J shared.

I don't know how experienced a user you are, but my perspective is that a little bit of extra typing is always worth some extra robustness and code clarity. (I would definitely not use 'o' instead of 'omitnan', though!)

At the very least, I would suggest reading the version history of nanmean, and understand the reasons that it is not recommended. (But, there are no plans to remove that function, so you are safe in that sense.)

Ralph Andrews 2023-2-13

that's cool i didn't think about wrapping it in a function, i definitely find it a lot more fiddly and time consuming to insert 'omitnan' flags instead of just 'nanmean'. and that's interesting to see why nanmean is not preferred, but i think for my usages nanmean does the job just fine :)

请先登录，再进行评论。