Why is parfor-loop is much slower than for-loop in this case?

4 次查看(过去 30 天)
I just started to explore the pros and cons of parfor-loop. In the simpy testing codes below, parfor-loop is much slower than for-loop. I don't understand why. Any feedbacks are appreciated. (My project is to process a large number of tables and collect the parsing data into a huge long table.)
for loop
(In my 8-core Mac, the elapsed time is in the order of 0.004 seconds.)
C = cell(2,1);
tic
for i = 1:2
A = rand(1,10);
T = array2table(A);
C{i} = T;
end
toc
Elapsed time is 0.033399 seconds.
parfor-loop
(In my 8-core Mac, the elapsed time is in the order of 0.03 seconds.)
D = cell(2,1);
tic
parfor i = 1:2
A = rand(1,10);
T = array2table(A);
D{i} = T;
end
Starting parallel pool (parpool) using the 'Processes' profile ...
toc
Elapsed time is 18.526561 seconds.

采纳的回答

Image Analyst
Image Analyst 2023-3-25
There is some setup time required to set up the different CPUs. If you have only 2 iterations and are using such tiny variables like you are, it's usually/mostly not worth it. Try with much larger variables and millions of loop iterations and see if it's better.
  2 个评论
Simon
Simon 2023-3-25
Thanks! So I did as you suggested, increasing the rand( ) to rand(20,20) and iteration to 20,000. The for-loop has elapsed time of 5.6 seconds, which is still faster than parfor-loop whose elapsed time is 6.7 seconds.
For-loop looks fast enough and has less overhead cost. It should be suitable to do the job for me.
Simon
Simon 2023-3-28
I tried again using parfor on my original tall table. In this real case, parfor-loop showed its power. All the 8 cores in the machine cranked up. The whole job is finiished less than 600 seconds. Amazing. Thanks for your explanation, which helps me to do it with my real data set.

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(0 个)

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Parallel for-Loops (parfor) 的更多信息

产品


版本

R2023a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by