Using knnsearch to find nearest values ignoring NaN's

26 次查看（过去 30 天）
Melissa
Melissa 2015-5-11
评论： David Young 2015-5-16
Hello,
I have two datasets. A is a high resolution global dataset, and B is a smaller dataset with sparse points. I want to find the indices of lat and lon in A that are closest to B lat and lon, but I want to ignore the NaN values in A and instead get the next closest value that isnt NaN.
Is there any way to do this?
A is a 2D dataset (latxlon) while B is three individual vectors of lat, lon, and data Which is why it makes it hard to use a lot of other commands.
Please let me know if you have any ideas,
Thanks,
Melissa
  3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论
Sean de Wolski
Sean de Wolski 2015-5-12
I think you need to project your lat/lon into x/y or compute the distance using a custom distance function in knnsearch such as distance() or ecefOffset. Otherwise distance is not measured on a sphere and is useless.
http://www.mathworks.com/help/releases/R2015a/stats/knnsearch.html
David Young
David Young 2015-5-16
Sean - you are right in that computing distances using lat and long as if they were euclidean coordinates is going to create some degree of error. But "useless" is too strong - provided that the lat-long grid is reasonably fine, and that there isn't an issue with wraparound, interpolation using a lat-long coordinate system may well be fine for many problems.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

David Young
David Young 2015-5-11
编辑：David Young 2015-5-12
You need to organise the nearest neighbour search so that it uses both latitude and longitude together, not search each separately. Try this, assuming you want to use Euclidean distance in geographical coordinates:
[rowA, colA] = find(~isnan(A));
lon_A = lon(colA); % I assume lon and lat convert from index to degrees
lat_A = lat(rowA);
idx = knnsearch([lon_A lat_A], [lon_B(:) lat_B(:)]);
nearest_lat = lat_a(idx);
nearest_lon = lon_a(idx);
nearest_Avalue = A(sub2ind(size(A), rowA(idx), colA(idx)));
I haven't checked this as I don't have your data or the statistics toolbox, but if it doesn't work please say what goes wrong in a comment.
[Edit: inserted call to sub2ind to correctly get nearest_Avalue.]
  2 个评论
Melissa
Melissa 2015-5-11
Thank you David,
Yes, it worked! But the only problem I have now is that the nearest value is in a 419x419 matrix when I would like it to be a vector of values correlated to the other vectors of lat and lon. Is there a way to make it in this format?
Thanks,
Melissa

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（1 个）

Thomas Koelen
Thomas Koelen 2015-5-11
What you could do is:
Lets say you have an array like this:
A= [10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 100]
and the smaller array like this:
[13 22]
For now let's just look at
B=[13]
We devide 13 from A and take the absolute.
C=abs(A-B)
this gives us:
C =
3 7 17 27 37 47 57 67 87
now can find the minimum, and get it's index.
[row,col]=min(C);
This gives index [1,1] which makes sense because 10 is closest to 13!

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Managing Data 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by