PMLSM Controller Over Active

7 次查看（过去 30 天）
John
John 2025-8-7
评论： John 2025-8-11
I started with the three phase PMLSM example: https://www.mathworks.com/help/sps/ug/three-phase-pmlsm-drive.html . I modified the outer control loop so that it regulates to a velocity set point instead of tracking position. The output scope capture shows that after some initial overshoot and undershoot it is able to maintain 0.5 m/s and then 0 m/s when a step change in the setpoint changes. However, the controller appears to be over active and the thrust and phase currents appear extremely noisy. Can someone give me some tips are troubleshooting steps to determine how to smooth out the control effort? Thank you.

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Sabin
Sabin 2025-8-8
There are a few things you can try.
  1. Increase the inverter switching frequency (in the example 2 kHz is used) and reduce the fundamental sample time. This will slow down the simulation, but we should see less ripple from the discretization. Controllers will need retuning as well.
  2. Re-tune the controllers so that they meet your specific requirements. Check this example if you’re considering using the PID autotuner block: https://www.mathworks.com/help/slcontrol/ug/tune-field-oriented-controllers-for-a-pmsm-using-closed-loop-pid-autotuner-block.html
  1 个评论
John
John 2025-8-11，19:58
Thanks for your suggestion. Increasing the PWM switching frequency did help. Also, I noticed the main problem was I had modeled the stator inductance to be significantly lower than the actual motor. Once the model parameters were corrected the phase currents became a lot smoother.

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（0 个）

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Real-Time PID Autotuning 的更多信息

标签

产品


版本

R2024b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by