How to avoid the for loops?

8 次查看(过去 30 天)
Jacky Jo
Jacky Jo 2015-10-25
评论: Stephen23 2015-10-26
I want to make the following code faster by avoiding the two for loops (if possible). I tried to make a vector multiplication .* operator which is not working here.
Since, the arguments / variables (Order, X and Y) are small, the Y_grid cell array can be calculated so fast here in the given script. However, I would like to make it as a function for later use. (So that, I can input different and higher arguments). Then the two for loops would make the programme so slow.
Inside the loops, there is a function too - (matFunction.m)*, is a small function here which needs varying input arguments. I don't want to make any change in this function.
Please have a look and suggest me some ideas! Many thanks in advance******
Order = 5;
X = 0:3;
Y = 0:5;
Y_grid {length(Y), length(X)}=zeros; % Initialization of cell array by zeros.
tic
for i=1:length(X)
for j=1:length(Y)
Y_grid{j,i}= matFunction( Order,Y(j),X(i) );
end
end
toc
(The matFunction.m* is given below. ):
function [ Mat ] = matFunction( Order , Y , X )
Mat=[0:1:Order]*X*Y;
Mat=repmat(Mat,Order,Order);
end

回答(1 个)

Stephen23
Stephen23 2015-10-25
编辑:Stephen23 2015-10-25
Here is a solution using matrix multiplication and one bsxfun call:
Order = 5;
X = 0:3;
Y = 0:5;
A = ones(Order,1)*(0:Order);
B = bsxfun(@times,A,reshape(Y(:)*X,1,1,[],numel(X)));
C = squeeze(num2cell(repmat(B,1,Order),[1,2]));
Under some circumstances this code is faster than the nested loops and separate function, but this depends on factors such as the matrix sizes, etc. With the values you give it is around 1/3 to 1/2 faster:
Elapsed time is 0.002530 seconds. % nested loops + function
Elapsed time is 0.001254 seconds. % matrix + bsxfun
To really make the code faster I would avoid cell arrays entirely, and just stick to using the dimensions of the numeric array. This makes writing vectorized code much more intuitive and easier.
  2 个评论
Jacky Jo
Jacky Jo 2015-10-25
Thanks for your answer Stephen Cobeldick.
But the situation is different. I actually working with a nested functions for spherical harmonics. My question (which I asked here) is only the main function of this nesting (Inside that I have two more functions). For simplification, I coded the above. Maybe I can post the real functions here now. (It might be complicated).
I would like to optimise the entire coding by avoiding the for loops wherever its possible. Here I think, only in the first function for loops can be avoided. In the function - 3 is recursion which could not be avoided.
More importantly, I would like to keep these three functions separate itself.
Could you have a rough look (or can do further, if you are intersted.) and give me an idea.
Many thanks!...
Function - 1 : Ylm_grid
function [ Y_grid ] = Ylm_grid( L_or_M , Co_latitude_grid , Longitude_grid )
tic
Y_grid {length(Co_latitude_grid), length(Longitude_grid)}=zeros; % Initialization of grid by zeros.
for i=1:length(Longitude_grid)
for j=1:length(Co_latitude_grid)
Y_grid{j,i}=Ylm( L_or_M,Co_latitude_grid(j),Longitude_grid(i));
end
end
toc
end
Function - 2 : Ylm
function [ RSlm ] = Ylm( Degree_or_Order , Co_latitude , Longitude )
P_mm_theta = Plt(Degree_or_Order,Co_latitude);
Rlm = P_mm_theta.*repmat( cosd( [0:1:Degree_or_Order]*Longitude ), [Degree_or_Order+1, 1] );
Slm = rot90(P_mm_theta.*repmat( sind( [0:1:Degree_or_Order]*Longitude ), [Degree_or_Order+1, 1] ),2);
Slm_new = [zeros(Degree_or_Order+1, 1), Slm(:,1:Degree_or_Order)];
RSlm = Rlm + Slm_new ;
end
Function - 3 : Plt
function [ P_bar ] = Plt( Degree_or_Order, Theta_In_Degree )
if (Degree_or_Order > 0 || Degree_or_Order ==0) % Program starts only when Degree is greater than Order
grid_length=length(Theta_In_Degree);
Cos(1,1,1:grid_length)=cosd(Theta_In_Degree);
Sin(1,1,1:grid_length)=sind(Theta_In_Degree);
P_bar(1,1,1:grid_length)=1/sqrt(4*pi) ; % P_bar(0,0) initialization
r=0;
for m=0:Degree_or_Order % The two for loops fill the matrix from M=0 to M
format long e; % -column-wise-
if m==0; del=1;
else del=0;
end
for L=r:Degree_or_Order
if and(L==m,m<Degree_or_Order) % Check the diagonal elements and assign values to array.
P_bar(m+2,m+2,1:grid_length)=Sin* sqrt( (((2*m)+3)*(1+del)) /...
((2*m)+2) ).*P_bar(m+1,m+1,1:grid_length);
elseif L==(m+1) % Check the lower diagonal elements and assign values to array.
P_bar(m+2,m+1,1:grid_length)=Cos*sqrt((2*m)+3).*P_bar(m+1,m+1,1:grid_length);
elseif and(L>m,L~=(m+1)) % Fills rest of the values to array.
P_bar(L+1,m+1,1:grid_length)=( Cos* sqrt( (((2*(L-1))+3)*((2*(L-1))+1)) / (((L-1)-m+1)*((L-1)+m+1)) ).*P_bar(L,m+1,1:grid_length) )...
-( sqrt( (((2*(L-1))+3)*(((L-1)^2)-(m*m))) / (((2*(L-1))-1)*((((L-1)+1)^2)-(m*m))) ) * P_bar(L-1,m+1,1:grid_length) );
end
end
r=r+1;
end
else
fprintf('\t\t\tError!\n\tPlease enter +ve number!\n');
end
end
Stephen23
Stephen23 2015-10-26
Interesting task... and not an easy question for us to answer. The first question: is it worth trying to optimize the code? If it takes a few hours of re-coding in order to save ten minutes of computation, then is this a good use of time? How much faster do you expect the code to be able to run?
One way that you might be able to speed it up is to consider removing any operations from inside the loops that are always the same or that are applied to the entire output of the loops, and placing these before/after the loops. In other words: pre-compute everything possible before the loops. This would be quite a fundamental change in how the code works, and might make it less intuitive to follow.

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Loops and Conditional Statements 的更多信息

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by