Reformat the date and time, and also show nanoseconds using mathlab
9 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
I made a program about the moving object distance calculation,I have problem in finding time to receive and send the difference to be precise in order of nano, how to find the mathlab retrieve data with nanosecond.thx
0 个评论
采纳的回答
Walter Roberson
2011-3-21
You need to tell us more about the data representation.
Are these value serial date numbers? If so then
>> eps(now)
ans =
1.16415321826935e-10
>> ans * 24*60*60
ans =
1.00582838058472e-05
which tells you that you cannot get higher resolution than 1000 nanoseconds using that format.
If you are trying to time events using tic and toc, then you will find that those clocks are only defined down to milliseconds (1000 Hz). To go beyond that requires system-dependent methods.
4 个评论
Walter Roberson
2011-3-31
Mathworks does not provide any means to time serial device events to nanoseconds. If you had the Data Acquisition Toolbox and were receiving the data with an appropriate card, you might be able to get access to higher resolution time stamps; I do not know how accurate they can go.
Recall that a nanosecond only about 2 clock cycles on a 2 GHz CPU. There is no way that an interpreted language such as MATLAB running on a multiprocessing system is going to be able to reliably interrupt and access hardware clock cycle counters within 2 instructions. For nanosecond measurements, you need a real-time device or additional hardware support.
更多回答(2 个)
James Tursa
2011-3-22
The "now" function is only good to about 0.015 sec accuracy. You should not use it for any timing that you need more precisely than that. e.g., run this code (Ctrl-C to stop it):
n = now;
while( true )
m = now;
if( m ~= n )
disp((m-n)*86400);
n = m;
end
end
You will have to get more precise timing some other way. e.g., if you have an OpenMP capable compiler you could get MTIMESX from the FEX and use its omp_get_wtime functionality. e.g.,
n = mtimesx('omp_get_wtime');
while( true )
m = mtimesx('omp_get_wtime');
if( m ~= n )
disp(m-n);
n = m;
end
end
On my system the above returns differences on the order of 1.5e-5 seconds (I presume this is all system dependent), so maybe something like this will work for you. MTIMESX (which admittedly is overkill for your situation) can be found here:
3 个评论
Walter Roberson
2011-3-31
You could multiply the difference by 10^9, but as discussed above that number not be meaningful to within 15000 nanoseconds.
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Simultaneous and Synchronized Operations 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!