Why is the result of the step signal convoluted with the impulse response of a lowpass filter not equal to the stepresponse of the lowpass filter?

1 次查看（过去 30 天）

显示更早的评论

timling 2017-11-8

0
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/365893-why-is-the-result-of-the-step-signal-convoluted-with-the-impulse-response-of-a-lowpass-filter-not-eq

评论： timling 2017-11-10

3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论隐藏 1更早的评论

timling 2017-11-8

Hi, Thanks for the quick answer

I thought modeling the impulsresponse of (1/s) is another way to get the step function in the time domain

And if you convolute the Stepfunction with the impulse response of the lowpass filter you would get the stepresponse of the lowpass filter

But it seems i got it to work like you said (replace the step with constant) and additionally i had to get rid of the impulse (also replace with constant):

Star Strider 2017-11-9

My pleasure.

I’m glad you got it sorted.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

回答（1 个）

Honglei Chen 2017-11-9

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/365893-why-is-the-result-of-the-step-signal-convoluted-with-the-impulse-response-of-a-lowpass-filter-not-eq#answer_290187

编辑：Honglei Chen 2017-11-9

You are mixing continuous and discrete in your model. For example, your impulse is discrete, your convolution is discrete, but your integrator is continuous. The following example used all discrete version and you can see the results match.

HTH

3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论隐藏 1更早的评论

Honglei Chen 2017-11-10

I just meant to show how can you match the two results.

timling 2017-11-10

Yes, I did mix discrete and continous Systems. Thanks for pointing that out. For sure that is the reason why both examples i showed in the beginning don't match. But I still don't understand why the result in every cas is the step Response of a highpass filter.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。