What is the difference between mean(A,'omitnan') and nanmean(A) ?
370 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Hi, I have a vector A (or could be a matrix) which contains finite values as well as NaNs. I want to compute the mean value of its non-NaN elements. What is the difference between mean(A,'omitnan') and nanmean(A) ? Thank you!
0 个评论
采纳的回答
Stephen23
2018-3-19
There is no practical difference for your vector.
Personally I would use mean, because nanmean is part of the Statistics Toolbox, so using it makes your code less portable.
3 个评论
Nathan Williamson
2020-5-2
On a related note, in my code I found median(A,'omitnan') to run significantly faster than nanmedian(A). Not sure why. In the same code, mean(A,'omitnan') and nanmean(A) have a similar runtime.
Andrew Frane
2024-12-4,3:08
编辑:Andrew Frane
2024-12-4,3:11
Looking at the code for the most recent (2020) version of nanmean, it's just a wrapper-function that executes the mean function with 'omitnan'. So it should perform nearly as efficiently.
But looking at the code for the most recent (2020) version of nanmedian, for some reason it doesn't just execute the median function with 'omitnan'. Instead, it just uses the prctile function to calculate the 50th percentile, which isn't a very computationally efficient way to calculate the median.
Incidentally, if A is a vector, (or if you want a single grand mean of a matrix or higher-dimensional array), you could also do something like the following, which avoids both the back-compatibility problem with 'omitnan' and the toolbox-dependence problem with nanmean and has similar efficiency:
mean( A(~isnan(A)) )
更多回答(1 个)
Walter Roberson
2018-3-19
nanmean() existed first, as part of the Statistics Toolbox.
Later 'omitnan' was added as an option to the regular mean() as part of basic MATLAB. nanmean() should now be used mostly for backwards compatibility.
0 个评论
另请参阅
产品
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!