Info
此问题已关闭。 请重新打开它进行编辑或回答。
Why this incongruency happens regarding number of pixels?
1 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Hi
I use the image I attached.
I use this line to get the sum of pixels from row 307 to 366, at columns from 464 to 490
for col = 464 : 490
heights(col) = sum(rgbImage(366,col) - rgbImage(307,col));
end
This subtraction would give us 59 pixels and with a calibration factor of 0,042 it would give us around 2,48 mm for all the columns.
When I export the values to an excel file I get
If you multiply the below values with 0,042 you only get around 6 values acceptable and the closest to 2,5mm.
Why this incongruency???
By measuring heights(col), I should get 59 pixels multiplied by 0,042 I would get around 2,47 mm. Why I don't get those values when I export them to Excel??
Any ideas?
1
5
7
10
13
21
31
38
48
54
58
65
69
76
75
73
69
67
66
58
52
45
39
33
28
24
18
14
11 个评论
Image Analyst
2019-2-24
If you have an RGB image, why are you conly giving two indexes? It should have 3.
Perhaps you'd find improfile easier since it just returns x,y coordinates and you can find the end points easily from the first element and the last element of the coordinates.
Why are you summing the values?
回答(1 个)
此问题已关闭。
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!