Why does spectral phase from the fft of gaussian pulse shows sawteeth?
15 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Hello.
I'm interested in spectral analysis on laser pulse. I made a test code in which gaussian pulse is analyzed in FFT. The analytic answer is that the spectral amplitude is also gaussian profile while spectral phase is all zero.
clear; close all;
% Temporal profile
delta_t = 0.1; % Sampling interval.
t = -90:delta_t:90;
t_p = 35; wavelength = 790E-9; c = 3E8; k = 2*pi/wavelength; w = k*c; w = w*1E-15; % It is Just for getting normalized central frequency. Not imporant for this code.
E_field = exp(-1.38629*(t/t_p).^2).*cos(w*t);
figure(1); subplot(2,2,1); plot(t,E_field); title('Temporal envelope'); xlabel('Time(fs)'); ylabel('E-field');
% Spectral profile
N = 10*length(t); % number of FFT data points is 10 times data points of temporal signal.
spectrum = fft(E_field,N);
frequency = (0:N-1)/(N*delta_t);
figure(1); subplot(2,2,2); plot(frequency,abs(spectrum)); title('Spectrum'); xlabel('frequency(1*10^1^5 Hz)');
% Detailed spectral profile including phase
[pkv,pkl] = max(abs(spectrum(1:fix(N/2)))); % pkl is location of global maxima.
data_width = 50; % Data width over which a left peak is showed in details.
spectral_amplitude = abs(spectrum);
spectral_phase = angle(spectrum);
figure(1); subplot(2,2,3); plot(frequency(pkl - data_width:pkl + data_width),spectral_amplitude(pkl - data_width:pkl + data_width)); title('Detailed spectrum'); xlabel('frequency(1*10^1^5 Hz)'); figure(1);
subplot(2,2,4); plot(frequency(pkl - data_width:pkl + data_width),spectral_phase(pkl - data_width:pkl + data_width)); title('Spectral phase'); xlabel('frequency(1*10^1^5 Hz)'); phase = spectral_phase(pkl)
Number of FFT data points N are far larger than that of temporal signal and is also integral multiple of delta_t (= 1/sampling frequency) to avoid so called leakage problem.
It is found that the amplitude is really good however, phase profile is sawteeth shape far from what I expected.
I believe that there is no reason why phase continuously decreases thus phase jumps are occured.
Is it due to some numerical error? what kind of error should I consider? How can I solve this problem thus exact phase analysis is being made?
0 个评论
采纳的回答
Wayne King
2012-8-5
编辑:Wayne King
2012-8-5
I don't think there is a problem, I think if you plot the following
subplot(211)
plot(frequency,abs(spectrum))
subplot(212)
plot(frequency,unwrap(angle(spectrum)))
You see that the phase is relatively constant except in the location of the positive and negative frequency peaks of the sinusoidal component.
You have to keep in mind that most of your DFT coefficients have small magnitudes and small variations in those values can cause jumps in the phase. Try a simple experiment with a single unwindowed cosine
Fs = 1000;
t = 0:1/Fs:1-1/Fs;
x = cos(2*pi*100*t);
xdft = fft(x);
plot(abs(xdft))
figure
plot(angle(xdft))
The phase is making apparent jumps throughout, but you have to consider whether those apparent phase jumps really matter. The truth is that most of them are associated with DFT coefficients with magnitudes on the order of 10^{-13} or so.
This is just the reality of phase estimation with computer implementations of the DFT.
更多回答(1 个)
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Spectral Estimation 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!