A simple classifier...does it work?

1 次查看（过去 30 天）
wolss
wolss 2019-7-1
评论： wolss 2019-7-2
Hi, I've just trained a Pattern Recognition Neural Network, that has to classify if there's or not a subject.
I gave it a target constituted by binary values organized in two columns that I had subsequently transposed to make it compatible with the network.
I also gave the network a dataset, constituted by n raws (signals) and m columns (samples), that I had to transposed for the same reason.
I choose a Hidden Size of 100, a validation checks of 50 and I obtained the results shown in attached figure, as gradient, performance, confusion, ROC and so on...
Can someone tell me if it works well or not?
Thank you, regards

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Himanshu tripathi
Yes, looking at the results it seems fine !
  2 个评论
wolss
wolss 2019-7-2
How can I justify the convergence due to validation checks? I mean.. we have usually the net convergence thanks to the reachment of the minimum gradient. In this case the gradient is not so low, as the performance, but we have anyway very good results, and so.. how can I justify the well working of the net even if I don't have a so good gradient?
Hope I've made myself clear...
Thank you anyway!
wolss
wolss 2019-7-2
I've another question for this answer... This pictures I've loaded on represent the net functioning (patternnet) with 10240 signals (and 512 samples). I've tried to do the same thing with 22528 signals (always with 512 samples for each one) but the net does not work so well.... Unfortunately it reaches at most 80%. How can I explain this?

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（0 个）

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Sequence and Numeric Feature Data Workflows 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by