pzmap(G+G) produces incorrect plot

1 次查看(过去 30 天)
Given a system with 2 zeros and 5 poles:
s = tf('s')
G = 8.75*(4*s^2+0.4*s+1)/((s/0.01+1)*(s^2+0.24*s+1)*(s^2/100+2*0.02*s/10+1))
pzmap(G+G) produces a pole zero map in which all the poles are cancelled by zeros, which is clearly incorrect. It is also different to the result of pzmap(2*G), which would be expected to be the same.
Can anyone explain this behaviour?

采纳的回答

Star Strider
Star Strider 2019-12-3
The ‘+’ operator connects the two ‘G’ models in parallel. They do appear to have pole-zero cancellation as the result:
s = tf('s');
G = 8.75*(4*s^2+0.4*s+1)/((s/0.01+1)*(s^2+0.24*s+1)*(s^2/100+2*0.02*s/10+1))
GG = G+G
figure
pzmap(GG)
Calculating the minimum realisation solves the problem:
GGmr = minreal(GG)
figure
pzmap(GGmr)
  2 个评论
Star Strider
Star Strider 2019-12-3
As always, my pleasure!
The ‘*’ operator would connect them in series.

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(0 个)

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Stability Analysis 的更多信息

产品

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by