Computing determinants of a 3D array
12 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Let’s say I have an NxNxL array. L is typically 10^4-10^5, and N is typically 10^0-10^1.
My goal is to calculate a vector of length L, where the i-th cell contains the determinant of (:,:,i).
I currently use for-loop, as det(A) accepts 3D arrays with the last dimension being a singleton, so this code works:
for i = 1:L
Vec(i) = det(Mat(:,:,i));
end
However, it seems weird that i can't implement this in a vectorial fasion. Can anybody think of any way to get rid of the for loop? Note that the format of an 3D array is pretty stiff, i.e. i can't change the input to cell array and use cellfun.
Thanks!
Yanir.
2 个评论
Matt J
2012-11-26
Hopefully, the reason you're asking for this is not for the purpose of solving many linear systems.
采纳的回答
Sean de Wolski
2012-11-26
What's wrong with the for-loop?
n=100;
pages = 1e4;
X = rand(n,n,pages);
D = zeros(pages,1);
tic;
for ii = 1:pages
D(ii) = det(X(:,:,ii));
end
toc;
%Elapsed time is 1.805616 seconds.
1 个评论
James Tursa
2012-11-27
My 2 cents to all:
The performance advantage of vectorized approaches to this is that one wishes to avoid the data copy involved with the X(:,:,ii) slices and the overhead of the loop. That being said, this data copy & loop overhead is in all likelihood swamped by the numerical calculations (and possible data copy) involved in the determinant calculation itself. So even if one were to get a vectorized one-liner to this that did not involve explicit slices, it probably wouldn't run significantly faster (if at all) than straight forward loops (the small size explicit code e.g. that Matt shows excepted).
更多回答(2 个)
Matt J
2012-11-26
编辑:Matt J
2020-4-8
For small N, it would be an advantage to vectorize the determinant formula explicitly (example for for N=2 below). For larger N, maybe you could do the same thing recursively.
%fake data
N=2;
L=1e5;
Mat=rand(N,N,L);
tic
Vec=zeros(1,L);
for ii=1:L
Vec(ii)=det(Mat(:,:,ii));
end
toc;
%Elapsed time is 0.194555 seconds.
Mat=reshape(Mat,[],L);
tic;
Vec =Mat(1,:).*Mat(4,:) - Mat(2,:).*Mat(3,:);
toc
%Elapsed time is 0.000378 seconds.
2 个评论
Pi Ting
2017-11-8
The line
Vec =Mat(1,:).*Mat(3,:) - Mat(2,:).*Mat(4,:);
should be
Vec =Mat(1,:).*Mat(4,:) - Mat(2,:).*Mat(3,:)?
Al in St. Louis
2020-4-8
I had to use Pi Ting's expression to get the correct answers. This is exactly what I need to do!
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Loops and Conditional Statements 的更多信息
产品
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!