Why R-squares are different between "fitglm" and "fitglme"? or how do "fitglme" and "fitglm" calculate R-squared?
10 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Hi,
I am using "fitglme" for fitting a mixed-effect logistic regression model.
I could have R-squared from the fitted model.
glme.Rsqaured.Adjusted
Then, I tried to have individual-subject R-squared by using "fitglm" for each subject.
But, the subjectwise-averaged R-squared from "fitglm" was so different from the R-squared of "fitglme".
Why are they so different?
I found that the "fitglm"s R-squared can be derived by the definition of R-squred:
y = glm.Variable.y;
yhat = glm.predict;
ybar = mean(y);
SST = sum((y-ybar).^2);
SSR = sum((yhat-ybar).^2);
R_square = SSR/SST;
R_square_glm = glm.Rsquared.Ordinary;
R_square = R_square_glm;
However, "fitglme"s R-squred is different from the derived R-squared;
y = glme.Variable.y;
yhat = glme.predict;
ybar = mean(y);
SST = sum((y-ybar).^2);
SSR = sum((yhat-ybar).^2);
R_square = SSR/SST;
R_square_glm = glme.Rsquared.Ordinary;
R_square ~= R_square_glm;
How shoud I understand this inconsistency?
I will highly appreciate for you help!
4 个评论
Aditya Patil
2020-11-17
How different is it? Some small differences might be present due to floating point accuracy. Can you provide complete code to reproduce the issue?
回答(0 个)
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Industrial Statistics 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!