Anonymous functions and integration

68 次查看（过去 30 天）
Jim
Jim 2013-4-22
I want to integrate an anonymous function but be able to manipulate it first. For example
f = @(x) [x -x sin(x)];
r = integral (f'*f, 0, 1, 'ArrayValued', true);
This isn't possible. I would have to define a new function but this isn't flexible. Any alternatives to directly manipulate f?
  1 个评论
Cedric
Cedric 2013-4-22
编辑：Cedric 2013-4-22
Either
r = integral (@(x)f(x)'*f(x), 0, 1, 'ArrayValued', true);
or
g = @(x)f(x)'*f(x) ;
r = integral (g, 0, 1, 'ArrayValued', true);
but that's what you call defining a new function I guess.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Kye Taylor
Kye Taylor 2013-4-22
Try
r = integral (@(x)f(x)'*f(x), 0, 1, 'ArrayValued', true);
  2 个评论
Jim
Jim 2013-4-22
This works, but does it evaluate f(x) twice?
Kye Taylor
Kye Taylor 2013-4-22
编辑：Kye Taylor 2013-4-22
Well, the integral function actually evaluates the function handle many times!
But, to answer your question, each time the function handle g = @(x)f(x)'*f(x) is evaluated by the integral function, the function handle f will be evaluated twice, though this will hardly affect performance.
If you're unconvinced, you could instead define the entire outer product:
g = @(x)[x^2 -x^2 x*sin(x);-x^2 x^2 -x*sin(x);x*sin(x) -x*sin(x) sin(x)^2]
then integrate
integral (g, 0, 1, 'ArrayValued', true);

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（1 个）

Mike Hosea
Mike Hosea 2013-4-22
MATLAB files can be flexible when they are combined with the use of anonymous functions. Anonymous functions can also be supplied as parameters to anonymous functions. The example given can be handled with simple nesting:
f1 = @(x)[x -x sin(x)]
f2 = @(x)x'*x;
g = @(x)f2(f1(x));
r = integral (g, 0, 1, 'ArrayValued', true);
More cleverness may be required in some cases, I guess. You can extend f2 to accept multiple inputs based on x or nest deeper, constructing what amounts to an evaluation tree to minimize redundant computations. -- Mike
  2 个评论
Jim
Jim 2013-4-22
That's an elegant solution. I wonder if there is any difference in performance from Kye's answer. I did a basic timing test of the two approaches and there isn't any meaningful difference in computation times.
Mike Hosea
Mike Hosea 2013-4-22
编辑：Mike Hosea 2013-4-22
I expect no significant difference on a simple function like this. It should be more valuable if the real f1 is rather expensive to evaluate or if the real f2 involves many uses of the input rather than just a pair. I didn't intend my response to be so much a competing answer to Kye's as a response to your concern with his solution. I probably should have made it a comment under his answer.

请先登录，再进行评论。

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 MATLAB 的更多信息

标签

产品

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by