Problem 32. Most nonzero elements in row
Solution Stats
Problem Comments

11 Comments
How am I wrong here?
"a = [ ...
1 0 0;
0 0 0;
0 0 0;
0 0 0;
0 2 3];
r_correct = 5;"
My code says 2, I think it's correct, what am I missing?
It wants the number of the row with the most nonzeros.
Thank you Tim! I feel like a fool, but that'll teach me to read the requirements more carefully. Hopefully.
Great Problem!
nice
Love this one
Piece of cake
nice
easy :) but nice
Could you please check my solution.
How come the solution example 2, 3 and 4 have r= 3, 5 and 4. When it should have been r = 4, 3 and 1.
As these are the maximum number of zeros in any of the given row.
Can someone please give me a hint on how the solutions are provided so different?
What are these matrices in last 3 test cases? Can someone help
Solution Comments

1 Comment
This problem is not difficult. But we still need to be careful

2 Comments
Nice solution!
nice solution!!

1 Comment
so happy~

2 Comments
there is a bug i the code
input a = [1 0 1 1 ; 9999 0 0 0]
output 2
there is a bug in the code
input a = [1 0 1 1 ; 9999 0 0 0]
output 2

1 Comment
r = max(sum((a==0)'));

1 Comment
Original solution I created by digging through documentation was x=a~=0; y=sum(x,2); [M,I]=max(y); r=max(y). Solution had a size of 31 so I compressed it into it's current version.

1 Comment
in case number 3 and 4 total number of element is also less than your correct fullest row output
How does this thing is possible

1 Comment
I did it!
(^^;)

1 Comment
this is a terrible solution, someone help.

1 Comment
Could you tell me how you did it?

1 Comment
Once again ive used a for loop only because it seems so much simpler. The more I do these I see how each person has a different approach to a problem which I think is very cool. Thanks for the problem!

1 Comment
test suite is not ok

2 Comments
what is the problem here ? it works on matlab and gives the correct row
2 things: You forgot to set your output (so add a line r=ix, or change the r in the first line into ix.
and you changed the function name so it doesn't recognize it.
Your solution does work.

1 Comment
Well done.

2 Comments
Is there any way to avoid this for loop??
Yes, a hint: compare with zeros matrix and count (sum) the nonzero elements in this logical matrix.

1 Comment
looks very strange

2 Comments
I can't believe I used a trick I learned from Javascript...
I tried to optimize my solution as much possible as I could, still my code size was 45, any idea what would be there in the leading solution of this problem which has code size as 11 ? Which trick did you use?
Problem Recent Solvers6724
Suggested Problems

1049 Solvers

461 Solvers

Matrix with different incremental runs
333 Solvers

Back to basics  mean of corner elements of a matrix
368 Solvers

820 Solvers
More from this Author96
Problem Tags
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!