搜索
How can I found my license I'd and password, so please provide me my id
I wanted to share something I've been thinking about to get your reactions. We all know that most MATLAB users are engineers and scientists, using MATLAB to do engineering and science. Of course, some users are professional software developers who build professional software with MATLAB - either MATLAB-based tools for engineers and scientists, or production software with MATLAB Coder, MATLAB Compiler, or MATLAB Web App Server.
I've spent years puzzling about the very large grey area in between - engineers and scientists who build useful-enough stuff in MATLAB that they want their code to work tomorrow, on somebody else's machine, or maybe for a large number of users. My colleagues and I have taken to calling them "Reluctant Developers". I say "them", but I am 1,000% a reluctant developer.
I first hit this problem while working on my Mech Eng Ph.D. in the late 90s. I built some elaborate MATLAB-based tools to run experiments and analysis in our lab. Several of us relied on them day in and day out. I don't think I was out in the real world for more than a month before my advisor pinged me because my software stopped working. And so began a career of building amazing, useful, and wildly unreliable tools for other MATLAB users.
About a decade ago I noticed that people kept trying to nudge me along - "you should really write tests", "why aren't you using source control". I ignored them. These are things software developers do, and I'm an engineer.
I think it finally clicked for me when I listened to a talk at a MATLAB Expo around 2017. An aerospace engineer gave a talk on how his team had adopted git-based workflows for developing flight control algorithms. An attendee asked "how do you have time to do engineering with all this extra time spent using software development tools like git"? The response was something to the effect of "oh, we actually have more time to do engineering. We've eliminated all of the waste from our unamanaged processes, like multiple people making similar updates or losing track of the best version of an algorithm." I still didn't adopt better practices, but at least I started to get a sense of why I might.
Fast-forward to today. I know lots of users who've picked up software dev tools like they are no big deal, but I know lots more who are still holding onto their ad-hoc workflows as long as they can. I'm on a bit of a campaign to try to change this. I'd like to help MATLAB users recognize when they have problems that are best solved by borrowing tools from our software developer friends, and then give a gentle onramp to using these tools with MATLAB.
I recently published this guide as a start:
Waddya think? Does the idea of Reluctant Developer resonate with you? If you take some time to read the guide, I'd love comments here or give suggestions by creating Issues on the guide on GitHub (there I go, sneaking in some software dev stuff ...)
Couldn’t catch everything at MATLAB EXPO 2025? You’re not alone. Across keynotes and track talks, there were too many gems for one sitting. For the next 9 weeks, we’ll reveal the "Top 10" sessions attended (workshops excluded)—one per week—so you can binge the best and compare notes with peers.
Starting at #10: Simulation-Driven Development of Autonomous UAVs Using MATLAB
A huge thanks to Dr. Shital S. Chiddarwar from Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology Nagpur who delivered this presentation online at MATLAB EXPO 2025. Are you curious how this workflow accelerates development and boosts reliability?
DocMaker allows you to create MATLAB toolbox documentation from Markdown documents and MATLAB scripts.
The MathWorks Consulting group have been using it for a while now, and so David Sampson, the director of Application Engineering, felt that it was time to share it with the MATLAB and Simulink community.
David listed its features as:
➡️ write documentation in Markdown not HTML
🏃 run MATLAB code and insert textual and graphical output
📜 no more hand writing XML index files
🕸️ generate documentation for any release from R2021a onwards
💻 view and edit documentation in MATLAB, VS Code, GitHub, GitLab, ...
🎉 automate toolbox documentation generation using MATLAB build tool
📃 fully documented using itself
😎 supports light, dark, and responsive modes
🐣 cute logo
I got an email message that says all the files I've uploaded to the File Exchange will be given unique names. Are these new names being applied to my files automatically? If so, do I need to download them to get versions with the new name so that if I update them they'll have the new name instead of the name I'm using now?
Currently, the open-source MATLAB Community is accessed via the desktop web interface, and the experience on mobile devices is not very good—especially switching between sections like Discussion, FEX, Answers, and Cody is awkward. Having a dedicated app would make using the community much more convenient on phones.
Similarty,github has Mobile APP, It's convient for me.
Is it possible to display a variable value within the ThingSpeak plot area?
https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/2182045-why-can-t-i-renew-or-purchase-add-ons-for-m…
"As of January 1, 2026, Perpetual Student and Home offerings have been sunset and replaced with new Annual Subscription Student and Home offerings."
So, Perpetual licenses for Student and Home versions are no more. Also, the ability for Student and Home to license just MATLAB by itself has been removed.
The new offering for Students is $US119 per year with no possibility of renewing through a Software Maintenance Service type offering. That $US119 covers the Student Suite of MATLAB and Simulink and 11 other toolboxes. Before, the perpetual license was $US99... and was a perpetual license, so if (for example) you bought it in second year you could use it in third and fourth year for no additional cost. $US99 once, or $US99 + $US35*2 = $US169 (if you took SMS for 2 years) has now been replaced by $US119 * 3 = $US357 (assuming 3 years use.)
The new offering for Home is $US165 per year for the Suite (MATLAB + 12 common toolboxes.) This is a less expensive than the previous $US150 + $US49 per toolbox if you had a use for those toolboxes . Except the previous price was a perpetual license. It seems to me to be more likely that Home users would have a use for the license for extended periods, compared to the Student license (Student licenses were perpetual licenses but were only valid while you were enrolled in degree granting instituations.)
Unfortunately, I do not presently recall the (former) price for SMS for the Home license. It might be the case that by the time you added up SMS for base MATLAB and the 12 toolboxes, that you were pretty much approaching $US165 per year anyhow... if you needed those toolboxes and were willing to pay for SMS.
But any way you look at it, the price for the Student version has effectively gone way up. I think this is a bad move, that will discourage students from purchasing MATLAB in any given year, unless they need it for courses. No (well, not much) more students buying MATLAB with the intent to explore it, knowing that it would still be available to them when it came time for their courses.
I struggle with animations. I often want a simple scrollable animation and wind up having to export to some external viewer in some supported format. The new Live Script automation of animations fails and sabotages other methods and it is not well documented so even AIs are clueless how to resolve issues. Often an animation works natively but not with MATLAB Online. Animation of results seems to me rather basic and should be easier!
Frequently, I find myself doing things like the following,
xyz=rand(100,3);
XYZ=num2cell(xyz,1);
scatter3(XYZ{:,1:3})
But num2cell is time-consuming, not to mention that requiring it means extra lines of code. Is there any reason not to enable this syntax,
scatter3(xyz{:,1:3})
so that I one doesn't have to go through num2cell? Here, I adopt the rule that only dimensions that are not ':' will be comma-expanded.
In the sequence of previous suggestion in Meta Cody comment for the 'My Problems' page, I also suggest to add a red alert for new comments in 'My Groups' page.
Thank you in advance.
I’m currently developing a multi-platform viewer using Flutter to eliminate the hassle of manual channel setup. Instead of adding IDs one by one, the app uses your User API Key to automatically discover and list all your ThingSpeak channels instantly.
Key Highlights (Work in Progress):
- Automatic Sync: All your channels appear in seconds.
- Multi-platform: Built for Web, Android, Windows, and Linux.
- Privacy-Focused: Secure local storage for your API keys.
(Requested for newer MATLAB releases (e.g. R2026B), MATLAB Parallel Processing toolbox.)
Lower precision array types have been gaining more popularity over the years for deep learning. The current lowest precision built-in array type offered by MATLAB are 8-bit precision arrays, e.g. int8 and uint8. A good thing is that these 8-bit array types do have gpuArray support, meaning that one is able to design GPU MEX codes that take in these 8-bit arrays and reinterpret them bit-wise as other 8-bit array types, e.g. FP8, which is especially common array type used in modern day deep learning applications. I myself have used this to develop forward pass operations with 8-bit precision that are around twice as fast as 16-bit operations and with output arrays that still agree well with 16-bit outputs (measured with high cosine similarity). So the 8-bit support that MATLAB offers is already quite sufficient.
Recently, 4-bit precision array types have been shown also capable of being very useful in deep learning. These array types can be processed with Tensor Cores of more modern GPUs, such as NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture. However, MATLAB does not yet have a built-in 4-bit precision array type.
Just like MATLAB has int8 and uint8, both also with gpuArray support, it would also be nice to have MATLAB have int4 and uint4, also with gpuArray support.
Missed a session or want to revisit your favorites? Now’s your chance!
Explore 42 sessions packed with insights, including:
✅4 inspiring keynotes
✅ 22 Customer success stories
✅5 Partner innovations
✅11 MathWorks-led technical talks
Each session comes with video recordings and downloadable slides, so you can learn at your own pace.
The Cody Contest 2025 has officially wrapped up! Over the past 4 weeks, more than 700 players submitted over 20,000 solutions. In addition, participants shared 20+ high-quality Tips & Tricksarticles—resources that will benefit Cody users for years to come.
Now it’s time to announce the winners.
🎉 Week 4 winners:
Weekly Prizes for Contest Problem Group Finishers:
@JKMSMKJ, @Yu Zhang, @Oliver Jaros, @Pauli Huusari, @Karl, @Marcos Silveira, @goc3, @Ildeberto de los Santos Ruiz, @Norberto, @Eric
Weekly Prizes for Contest Problem Group Solvers:
Weekly Prizes for Tips & Tricks Articles:
This week’s prize goes to @WANG Zi-Xiang. See the comments from our judge and problem group author @Matt Tearle:
‘We had a lot of great tips for solving Cody problems in general and the contest problems specifically. But we all know there are those among us who, having solved the problem, still want to tinker and make their code better. There are different definitions of "better", but code size remains the base metric in Cody. Enter Wang Zi-Xiang who compiled a list of many tips for reducing Cody size. This post also generated some great discussion (even prompting our insane autocrat, Lord Ned himself, to chime in). I particularly like the way that, while reducing Cody size often requires some arcane tricks that would normally be considered bad coding practice, the intellectual activity of trying to "game the system" makes you consider different programming approaches, and sometimes leads you to learn corners of MATLAB that you didn't know.’
🏆 Grand Prizes for the Main Round
Team Relentless Coders:
2nd Place: @Roberto
Team Creative Coders:
Team Cool Coders
Congratulations to all! Securing a top position on the leaderboard requires not only advanced MATLAB skills but also determination and consistency throughout the four-week contest. You will receive Amazon gift cards.
🥇 Winning Team
The competition was incredibly tight—we even had to use the tie-breaker rule.
Both Team Cool Coders and Team Relentless Coders achieved 16 contest group finishers. However, the last finisher on Cool Coders completed the problem group at 1:02 PM on Dec 7, while the last finisher on Relentless Coders finished at 9:47 PM the same day.
Such a close finish! Congratulations to Team Cool Coders, who have earned the Winning Team Finishers badge.
🎬 Bonus Round
Invitations have been sent to the 6 players who qualified for the Bonus Round. Stay tuned for updates—including the Big Watch Party afterward!
Congratulations again to all winners! We’ll be reaching out after the contest ends. It has been an exciting, rewarding, and knowledge-packed journey.
See you next year!
Our exportgraphics and copygraphics functions now offer direct and intuitive control over the size, padding, and aspect ratio of your exported figures.
- Specify Output Size: Use the new Width, Height, and Units name-value pairs
- Control Padding: Easily adjust the space around your axes using the Padding argument, or set it to to match the onscreen appearance.
- Preserve Aspect Ratio: Use PreserveAspectRatio='on' to maintain the original plot proportions when specifying a fixed size.
- SVG Export: The exportgraphics function now supports exporting to the SVG file format.
Check out the full article on the Graphics and App Building blog for examples and details: Advanced Control of Size and Layout of Exported Graphics
No, staying home (or where I'm now)
25%
Yes, 1 night
0%
Yes, 2 nights
12.5%
Yes, 3 nights
12.5%
Yes, 4-7 nights
25%
Yes, 8 nights or more
25%
8 个投票
Hi everyone
I've been using ThingSpeak for several years now without an issue until last Thursday.
I have four ThingSpeak channels which are used by three Arduino devices (in two locations/on two distinct networks) all running the same code.
All three devices stopped being able to write data to my ThingSpeak channels around 17:00 CET on 4 Dec and are still unable to.
Nothing changed on this side, let alone something that would explain the problem.
I would note that data can still be written to all the channels via a browser so there is no fundamental problem with the channels (such as being full).
Since the above date and time, any HTTP/1.1 'update' (write) requests via the REST API (using both simple one-write GET requests or bulk JSON POST requests) are timing out after 5 seconds and no data is being written. The 5 second timeout is my Arduino code's default, but even increasing it to 30 seconds makes no difference. Before all this, responses from ThingSpeak were sub-second.
I have recompiled the Arduino code using the latest libraries and that didn't help.
I have tested the same code again another random api (api.ipify.org) and that works just fine.
Curl works just fine too, also usng HTTP/1.1
So the issue appears to be something particular to the combination of my Arduino code *and* the ThingSpeak environment, where something changed on the ThingSpeak end at the above date and time.
If anyone in the community has any suggestions as to what might be going on, I would greatly appreciate the help.
Peter
I believe that it is very useful and important to know when we have new comments of our own problems. Although I had chosen to receive notifications about my own problems, I only receive them when I am mentioned by @.
Is it possible to add a 'New comment' alert in front of each problem on the 'My Problems' page?
Over the past three weeks, players have been having great fun solving problems, sharing knowledge, and connecting with each other. Did you know over 15,000 solutions have already been submitted?
This is the final week to solve Cody problems and climb the leaderboard in the main round. Remember: solving just one problem in the contest problem group gives you a chance to win MathWorks T-shirts or socks.
🎉 Week 3 Winners:
Weekly Prizes for Contest Problem Group Finishers:
@Umar, @David Hill, @Takumi, @Nicolas, @WANG Zi-Xiang, @Rajvir Singh Gangar, @Roberto, @Boldizsar, @Abi, @Antonio
Weekly Prizes for Contest Problem Group Solvers:
Weekly Prizes for Tips & Tricks Articles:
This week’s prize goes to @Cephas. See the comments from our judge and problem group author @Matt Tearle:
'Some folks have posted deep dives into how to tackle specific problems in the contest set. But others have shared multiple smaller, generally useful tips. This week, I want to congratulate the cumulative contribution of Cool Coder Cephas, who has shared several of my favorite MATLAB techniques, including logical indexing, preallocation, modular arithmetic, and more. Cephas has also given some tips applying these MATLAB techniques to specific contest problems, such as using a convenient MATLAB function to vectorize the Leaderboard problem. Tip for Problem 61059 – Leaderboard for the Nedball World Cup:'
Congratulations to all Week 3 winners! Let’s carry this momentum into the final week!
