# of counts in whole image vs #counts in masked image +mask? shoul be same or not???
1 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Dear all,
I did histograms of :
1. whole image
2. image masked
3. image with inverted masked
I would expect sum of counts in 2+3 shall be same as in 1. But it is not. So is this because of the mask line width (I do masking with imfreehand).. and double assigning of some pixels to masked and reversed masked region?, or is my procedure somehow wrong. Scheme is as follows
masked_image=whole_image.*mask;
inverse_masked_image=whole_image.*(~mask)
the numbers differ like 1=65536, and(2+3)=78086..
thanks!
4 个评论
Image Analyst
2014-5-17
I don't have that image. Can you illustrate with a standard demo image like cameraman.tif or something?
采纳的回答
Image Analyst
2014-5-17
All images are the same size (unless you cropped them), so all images should have the same number of counts . The fact that some pixels have been set to 0 or 255 (masked) does not affect the number of pixels they have and so the count from imhist() or hist() or histc() will be the same, which is numel(grayImage).
更多回答(0 个)
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!