Radon transform in matlab

14 次查看(过去 30 天)
Alan AF
Alan AF 2014-5-29
编辑: Matt J 2014-6-3
Hi Everyone, Is there any numerically efficient package to compute the Radon transform and the back projection, probably using the non-uniform forier transform!
actually what I am looking for is a forward and inverse projector for tomography problem. I tried the Matlab Radon function but I noticed that if you apply it iteratively(as in the code below) the Image will be bleared! are there any solution for this problem?
x = phantom('Modified Shepp-Logan',256);
[Sinogram,xp] = radon(x,1:0.1:180);
for i=1:10
I = iradon(Sinogram, 1:0.1:180);
[Sinogram,xp] = radon(I,1:0.1:180);
end
imtool(I);

回答(2 个)

Matt J
Matt J 2014-5-29
编辑:Matt J 2014-5-29
but I noticed that if you apply it iteratively(as in the code below) the Image will be bleared!
Reconstruction is always lossy because all the projection and DSP operations involved are discretized, rather than occuring in ideal, continuous space. If you iteratively project and reconstruct, the loss accumulates.
  8 个评论
Alan AF
Alan AF 2014-5-29
Yes, I have tried the Matlab radon function as below, and the result was a blurred image, however the NUFFT code results was a blank image with vertical lines?! would you plz have a look on NUFFT code that I wrote ( download )
x = phantom('Modified Shepp-Logan',256);
[Sinogram,xp] = radon(x,1:0.1:180);
for i=1:30
I = iradon(Sinogram, 1:0.1:180,'linear','Ram-Lak');
[Sinogram,xp] = radon(I,1:0.1:180);
end
imtool(I);
Matt J
Matt J 2014-5-29
It won't mean anything to me. I've never worked with NUFFT projectors.

请先登录,再进行评论。


Bjorn Gustavsson
Bjorn Gustavsson 2014-5-29
Why would you want to repeat the process in the first place? If you have data for every 0.1 degree (according to your calculation of the sinogram) then the iradon function calculates the proper inverse (you might select different filters for the transform and such), therefore you'll only enhance the problems with the inverse (blurring, pixeling, aliasing and possibly noise amplification if you have noise in your real data and whatnot), put an image display inside the loop together with a drawnow and see how things evolve...
If you want to look at some iterative algorithm you have to explain what you want to study.
HTH,
  6 个评论
Alan AF
Alan AF 2014-6-3
Hi Matt would you elaborate more about the scaling for the physical sizes, do you mean resolution?
Matt J
Matt J 2014-6-3
编辑:Matt J 2014-6-3
The radon transform is a line integral through the image. Roughly, it works by finding the intersection lengths of projection rays with pixels and multiplies by the length of intersection. But to compute the length of intersection, you have to know the pixel dimensions, e.g., in millimeters. Matlab's RADON command just assumes the pixels dimensions are 1x1 unitless. You would have to scale the result by the pixel lengths to get things in real units. I don't know whether you are doing that currently
But the Fessler NUFFT code might be drawing pixel dimension information from somewhere already, e.g., input you gave it.

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Biomedical Imaging 的更多信息

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by