asalam.A.
显示 更早的评论
i have a question regarding computer ( karnaugh map) , i certainly wish that a computer teacher explains me a question , x'y'z' + x'y'z + x'yz + xyz' . this is the equation, the apostrophe represents inverse, my answer is coming x'z+z' , is it right or wrong?. i want the answer till tom , like within 10 hours.
4 个评论
abeer hafeez
2021-9-25
So I believe you're asking whether the 2 expresssions are equivalent. Unfortunately your solution I believe is incorrect. Below is code that highlights one example of where your expression doesn't match.
x = 0;
y = 1;
z = 0;
if((~x*~y*~z + ~x*~y*~z + ~x*y*z + x*y*z)==(~x*z+~z))
fprintf("Equal for x'yz'\n")
else
fprintf("Unequal for x'yz'\n")
end
Below is my work and how I got to it using a Kurnagh map.

abeer hafeez
2021-9-25
abeer hafeez
2021-9-25
回答(3 个)
The above answer you provided was incorrect. Below shows a case to prove it.
x = 0;
y = 1;
z = 0;
if (~x*~y*~z+~x*~y*z+~x*y*z+x*y*~z==~x*z+~z)
fprintf("Equivalent for x'yz'\n");
else
fprintf("Not equivalent for x'yz'\n")
end
Below is the kurnuagh map that arrives at the solution
3 个评论
abeer hafeez
2021-9-26
Erik Huuki
2021-9-26
编辑:Erik Huuki
2021-9-26
The only answer I can come up with is that your mistaking xor with or. Symbolically they look similar but have very different meanings. So an alternative answer could be x^yz’. where ^ is the operator for xor
Erik Huuki
2021-9-26
xor means “exclusive or” Ex. 0^0=0 0^1=1 1^0=1 1^1=0
%x'y'z' + x'y'z + x'yz + xyz'
[x, y, z] = ndgrid([false true]);
x = x(:); y = y(:); z = z(:);
actual_output = (~x & ~y & ~z) | (~x & ~y & z) | (~x & y & z) | (x & y & ~z);
proposed_output = (~x & z) | (~z);
answer_from_notes = (~x);
table(x, y, z, proposed_output, answer_from_notes, actual_output )
You can see from this that both the proposed expression you made, and the answer from the notes, must be incorrect. The proposed output differs from the actual output in the second and third lines.
1 个评论
When I look carefully at the way the question is drawn, it looks like possibly instead of
(that you implemented) that the term is
. and likewise in the second term. The notation needs to be examined carefully.
[x, y, z] = ndgrid([false true]);
x = x(:); y = y(:); z = z(:);
actual_output = (~(x & y) & ~z) | (~(x & y) & z) | (~x & y & z) | (x & y & ~z);
proposed_output = (~x & z) | (~z);
answer_from_notes = (~x);
table(x, y, z, proposed_output, answer_from_notes, actual_output)
abeer hafeez
2021-9-26
0 个投票
3 个评论
[x, y] = ndgrid([false, true]);
x = x(:); y = y(:);
expression = (~x & ~y) | (x & y);
table(x, y, expression)
In order for your z'(y'x' + xy) ---> z' to be true, then the output expression above would have to be true in each case.
xy + x'y' is "not exclusive or"
nox = ~xor(x, y);
table(x, y, expression, nox)
Walter Roberson
2021-9-26
The only thing I can think of for why they mark z in the diagram the way they do, is if there is another equation you have not shown us that defines z in terms of x and y. In such a case there would only be 4 states instead of 8.
abeer hafeez
2021-9-26
类别
在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Computer Vision with Simulink 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!

