Efficient way to calculate backwards average

11 次查看(过去 30 天)
Dear all,
I'm looking for an efficient way to calculate a backwards moving average, i.e., giving a vector A I want to calculate a vector A2 for which the element i is equal to mean(A(i:end)).
For the moment I am doing it this way:
A=rand(1,1000);
n=length(A);
A2=zeros(1,n)
for i=1:n
A2(i)=mean(A(i:end));
end
Is there any better way?
Thanks
Lorenzo

采纳的回答

John D'Errico
John D'Errico 2014-9-29
编辑:John D'Errico 2014-9-29
First of all, what you SAY you are doing makes no sense. A is a 1000x1000 matrix, but A2 only a vector. And you have two i for loops, with only one end. And regardless of what size A is, n=size(A) will produce a vector. So 1:n will yield a problem in the for loop.
The code you show will fail in so many ways I won't bother to count. You should provide working code so someone can know what it is you really want!
Assuming that you really wanted to write this where A is a row vector...
Think about what cumsum does. Then, suppose you flipped the data before calling cumsum.
n = length(A);
A2 = fliplr(cumsum(fliplr(A))./(1:n)));
Of course, this is really not a true moving average, since that would involve a moving window of fixed length. But it is what you asked for.
  4 个评论
Lorenzo
Lorenzo 2014-9-30
编辑:Lorenzo 2014-9-30
John, works great, thanks. In case I have a matrix of signals instead of a single vector and I wanted to do what we are doing here with every column of this matrix, I can either loop trough the column and use you code above or do this:
c2=size(A);
rows=c2(1);
columns=c2(2);
A2=flipud(cumsum(flipud(A))./repmat((1:rows)',1,columns));
do you see any better way?
Thanks
Lorenzo
John D'Errico
John D'Errico 2014-10-1
That will work fine, although a minor optimization would be to use bsxfun to do the divide instead of replicating the vector using repmat.
A2=flipud(bsxfun(@rdivide,cumsum(flipud(A)),(1:rows)'));

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(4 个)

José-Luis
José-Luis 2014-9-29
numRows = 100;
numCols = 100;
data = rand(numRows,numCols);
result = flipud(bsxfun(@rdivide,cumsum(flipud(data)),(1:numRows)));
  1 个评论
Lorenzo
Lorenzo 2014-9-30
Thanks José. I'm getting something weird at the end of the signal though… In case of a vector it should be:
result(end)=data(end)
but I'm not getting this with your method…

请先登录,再进行评论。


Chad Greene
Chad Greene 2014-9-29
This is a very fast moving average calculator. It centers data, so if you use an N-point moving average, after calculating the moving averaged, you could shift by N/2 to get the "backwards" moving average.
  1 个评论
Image Analyst
Image Analyst 2014-9-29
He doesn't want a moving average. His window is not constant length, but gets shorter as the index approaches the end of the array.

请先登录,再进行评论。


SK
SK 2014-9-29
编辑:SK 2014-9-29
s = sum(A);
n = length(A);
A2 = (s - cumsum(A))/n;
is a little more elegant and I would think faster. But you have to add s/N to the beginning of A2 and remove the 0 at the end of A2.
The last operation (removing the zero) is misleadingly innocent:
A2(end) = [];
But you may soon get to know the consequences of it.
  1 个评论
Lorenzo
Lorenzo 2014-9-30
Thanks SK. This doesn't seem to do what I need though… not sure what it is supposed to do…

请先登录,再进行评论。


Lorenzo
Lorenzo 2014-9-30
编辑:Lorenzo 2014-9-30
Thanks everybody for the answers.
With a vector of 50k elements I get the following run time:
my method: 10.17 s
John's method: 0.006 s
  1 个评论
Stephen23
Stephen23 2014-9-30
Unless you are actually answering your own question, write a comment to your original question or one of the answers. There is no guarantee that the answers remain in any particular order...

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Matrix Indexing 的更多信息

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by