Unexpected, unexplained, difference between Matrix linear index and row and column subscripts
1 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Jad Michele Samuel Musallam
2021-10-26
编辑: Jad Michele Samuel Musallam
2021-10-26
Good Morning;
writing a script I found myself discovering a difference i cannot explained.
for i=size(P,1)*size(P,2)
if A(i)>1
A(i)=1;
B(i)=P(i).*(2./(gamma+1));
C(i)=P(i)-(P(i)-B(i))./eta(type);
D(i)=Q(i).*(C(i)./P(i)).^(gamma./(gamma-1));
E(i)=sqrt(gamma.*R.*B(i));
F(i)=E(i);
end
end
writing the above code the end results were not as expected. i then wrote the same operations nesting 2 for cycles (row and column subscripts)
for i=1:size(P,1)
for j=1:size(P,2)
if A(i,j)>1
A(i,j)=1;
B(i,j)=P(i,j).*(2./(gamma+1));
C(i,j)=P(i,j)-(P(i,j)-B(i,j))./eta(type);
D(i,j)=Q(i,j).*(C(i,j)./P(i,j)).^(gamma./(gamma-1));
E(i,j)=sqrt(gamma.*R.*B(i,j));
F(i,j)=E(i,j);
end
end
end
this, strangely to me, gave me a different end result. I could not understand why.
A,B,C,D,E,F,P,Q
are all matrices of same dimension and enter both cycles with same values, same goes for
gamma,eta, type
I would appreciate if someone would be able to explain the difference in the two methods, that should have behaved identically in my mind.
tips on more efficient/elegant ways of achieving the above are also welcome
0 个评论
采纳的回答
Bruno Luong
2021-10-26
编辑:Bruno Luong
2021-10-26
Try to change
for i=size(P,1)*size(P,2)
to
for i=1:size(P,1)*size(P,2)
You light also learn to use debugger so such task.
更多回答(1 个)
Esen Ozbay
2021-10-26
编辑:Esen Ozbay
2021-10-26
You have forgotten to write 1: in the first line.
for i=size(P,1)*size(P,2)
must be
for i = 1:size(P,1)*size(P,2)
You probably got 0's in all elements except one in the arrays you obtained.
0 个评论
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Matrices and Arrays 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!