Is there any more effiecient way to implement this?
1 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Using MATLAB:I have a table of lets say x(size(100x1)),y(size(100x1)) and z(size(100x100)) and i use
z1 = interp2(x,y,z,x1,x2)
to find a scalar value that i need for later calculation. I was wondering if there is a more efficient/quicker way to implement this.scatteredInterpolant function could help? I tried unsuccessfully to implement it with scatteredInterpolant
2 个评论
采纳的回答
Mohammad Abouali
2014-10-18
编辑:Mohammad Abouali
2014-10-18
scatteredInterpolant is suitable for cases where your source grid is scattered. If you were able to use interp2 it means that your source grid is not scattered. Although you can still use scattered interpolant, it does not give you any additional benefit.
Here are two approaches:
1) using gridded interpolant:
[XGrid,YGrid]=meshgrid(x,y);
F=griddedInterpolant(XGrid',YGrid',z','cubic');
Then you can query that for any point as follow:
z1=F(x1,x2);
x1,x2 could be scattered points or gridded. If it is gridded it should follow NDGrid format.
2) Using Scattered Interpolant:
[XGrid,YGrid]=meshgrid(x,y);
F=scatteredInterpolant(XGrid(:), YGrid(:),z(:));
Then you can query that for any point as follow:
z1=F(x1,x2);
更多回答(1 个)
per isakson
2014-10-18
编辑:per isakson
2014-10-18
If linear is good enough as you indicate in the question (default of interp2).
My approach to a similar performance problem included
- avoid the function call. The call itself takes longer than the computation (of a scalar)
- a few lines of code, which do the interpolation, directly in the "calling" code.
0 个评论
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!