How to generate a ramp up and ramp down sequence using Matlab Function in Simulink?

Question

Amadou Bah 2021-11-25

0
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/1595349-how-to-generate-a-ramp-up-and-ramp-down-sequence-using-matlab-function-in-simulink

评论： Kiran Isapure 2022-9-13

In the code i want to accelerate from 300rad/s to 302rad/s from t=5 to t=5.3. Then stay at 302 from t=5.3 to t=6.3. And then decelerate to 300rad/s from t=6.3 to 6.6.

However, I think my code is not right because I have another change in speed before i reached 302. Likewise during the deceleration.

1 个评论
显示 -1更早的评论隐藏 -1更早的评论

Kiran Isapure 2022-9-13

Hi Amadou,

I am also trying to fast ramp up to 300 deg/sec and hold that speed to sometime and then slow ramp down.

Can you help me how to go ahead with this ?

Thanks

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

Answer 1

Srijith Kasaragod 2021-12-3

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/1595349-how-to-generate-a-ramp-up-and-ramp-down-sequence-using-matlab-function-in-simulink#answer_846700

Hi Amadou,

I understand the issue you are facing is that there are two slopes generated in the ramp up and ramp down sections of the signal. One possible workaround is to specify the 'Max step size' option in Solver Configuration Parameters. Specifying a value of 0.1 enables the solver to track the signal changes effectively and only a single slope is obtained as intended. The solver might be missing significant behaviour from the default time step values, so changing the time step value could prevent the solver from taking too large a step.

Regards.

1 个评论
显示 -1更早的评论隐藏 -1更早的评论

Amadou Bah 2021-12-6

Hi @Srijith Kasaragod, you're right the solver setting was the problem. I reduced the step size, but I also had to switch from variable-step to fixed-step solver, then the problem is solved.

Thank you.

请先登录，再进行评论。