Why do matlab and python convert Euler angles to quaternions with different results?
显示 更早的评论
I converted the following Euler angles/radians into quaternions using matlab's built-in function eul2quat, the external order is: first around the x-axis, then around the y-axis, and finally around the z-axis.
eulars = [-1.78E-15 -0.09548759 -3.141592;
-1.78E-15 -0.09548759 -3.141592;
0 -0.1113647 -3.136936;
-0.000419181 -0.1113141 -3.132684;
-0.000802144 -0.1113117 -3.128802;
-0.001152084 -0.1113079 -3.12526;
-0.001180313 -0.1101197 -3.122032;
-0.001413606 -0.1086281 -3.119092;
-0.001928661 -0.1062565 -3.116415];
matlab_q = eul2quat(eulars,"ZYX")% first x, then y,final z
Then I also used python to convert the above data to quaternions as follows:
from scipy.spatial.transform import Rotation as R
import numpy as np
myeulars = np.array([[-1.78E-15, -0.09548759, -3.141592],
[-1.784486e-15, -0.09548759, -3.141592],
[0, -0.1113647 , -3.136936],
[-0.000419181 , -0.1113141, -3.132684],
[-0.000802144, -0.1113117, -3.128802],
[-0.001152084 , -0.1113079, -3.12526],
[-0.001180313 , -0.1101197, -3.122032],
[-0.001413606 , -0.1086281, -3.119092],
[-0.001928661 , -0.1062565, -3.116415]])
python_q = R.from_euler('xyz', myeulars, degrees=False).as_quat() # first x, then y,final z
print(python_q)
[[-4.77256586e-02 -1.55965008e-08 -9.98860482e-01 3.26422508e-07]
[-4.77256586e-02 -1.55965008e-08 -9.98860482e-01 3.26422508e-07]
[-5.56534295e-02 -1.29579605e-04 -9.98447432e-01 2.32471611e-03]
[-5.56286986e-02 -3.85220084e-05 -9.98441671e-01 4.43575562e-03]
[-5.56285404e-02 4.46916188e-05 -9.98431257e-01 6.36307029e-03]
[-5.56280572e-02 1.20882279e-04 -9.98418522e-01 8.12154965e-03]
[-5.50351559e-02 5.10113472e-05 -9.98436979e-01 9.73287224e-03]
[-5.42918402e-02 9.49786087e-05 -9.98462346e-01 1.11951287e-02]
[-5.31111500e-02 2.94403626e-04 -9.98510080e-01 1.25195214e-02]]
The above data result is left-right symmetric, according to the documentation, matlab uses quaternions of the form w+x*i+y*j+z*k output; while python uses quaternions of the form x*i+y*j+z*k+w.
It can be inferred that the matlab calculation result (a,b,c,d) should correspond to the python order (w,x,y,z), why the above result corresponds to the python is (w,z,y,x)?
b = quaternion(eulars,'euler','XYZ','point') % However, this result is consistent with Python
9×1 quaternion array
3.2642e-07 - 0.047726i - 1.5597e-08j - 0.99886k
3.2642e-07 - 0.047726i - 1.5597e-08j - 0.99886k
0.0023247 - 0.055653i - 0.00012958j - 0.99845k
0.0044358 - 0.055629i - 3.8522e-05j - 0.99844k
0.0063631 - 0.055629i + 4.4692e-05j - 0.99843k
0.0081215 - 0.055628i + 0.00012088j - 0.99842k
0.0097329 - 0.055035i + 5.1011e-05j - 0.99844k
0.011195 - 0.054292i + 9.4979e-05j - 0.99846k
0.01252 - 0.053111i + 0.0002944j - 0.99851k
采纳的回答
更多回答(0 个)
类别
在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Mapping and Localization Using Vision and Lidar Data 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!