comm.ViterbiDecoder performing worse than vitdec
2 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
I'm trying to get a simple "Hello World" example of convolutional coding and decoding to work. For some reason, the comm.ViterbiDecoder won't ever correctly decode the data, no matter which options I tried, while vitdec works just fine.
trellis = poly2trellis(7,[171 133]);
encoder1 = comm.ConvolutionalEncoder(trellis);
data = randi([0 1],70,1);
codedData = encoder1(data);
tbdepth = 34;
commDecoder = comm.ViterbiDecoder(trellis, 'TracebackDepth', tbdepth, 'InputFormat','Hard','TerminationMethod','Terminated');
decodedData1 = vitdec(codedData,trellis,tbdepth,'trunc','hard');
decodedData2 = commDecoder(codedData);
BER1 = biterr(data,decodedData1)
BER2 = biterr(data,decodedData2)
0 个评论
采纳的回答
Nadia Shaik
2023-3-6
Hi Marian,
I understand that "comm.ViterbiDecoder" is not decoding the data as compared to "vitdec". The different termination methods could explain why the bit error rate differs between the two decoders.
In your case, you are using the "Terminated" method for "comm.ViterbiDecoder", and "trunc" for "vitdec". Consider setting the termination method "Truncated" for "comm.ViterbiDecoder" instead.
Here is the updated code snippet:
trellis = poly2trellis(7,[171 133]);
encoder1 = comm.ConvolutionalEncoder(trellis);
data = randi([0 1],70,1);
codedData = encoder1(data);
tbdepth = 34;
commDecoder = comm.ViterbiDecoder(trellis, 'TracebackDepth', tbdepth, 'InputFormat','Hard','TerminationMethod','Truncated');
decodedData1 = vitdec(codedData,trellis,tbdepth,'trunc','hard');
decodedData2 = commDecoder(codedData);
BER1 = biterr(data,decodedData1)
BER2 = biterr(data,decodedData2)
I hope this helps!
更多回答(0 个)
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Error Detection and Correction 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!