Bar3 crahes by plotting a cell array in a loop

1 次查看(过去 30 天)
Hi,
I have a M, which is a cell Array M, which is 1×1 cell array of {1×292 cell}. Each of the 292 consits again of cells different sizes
. M{1}=ans
1×292 cell array
Columns 1 through ...292
{1×288 cell} {1×288 cell} {1×287 cell} ...{1x260}.
Each of these cells consits of doubles with different number of rows but fixes amount of columns(15).
m{1}{1}= ans
1×288 cell array
Columns 1 through ...288
{34×15 double} {36×15 double} {37×15 double}.. {95x15}.
I would like to plot M with bar3. My code:
figure();
Az=(1:1:15);
for t1=1:292
for t2=1:length( M{1}{t1})
bar3(Az,(cell2mat(M{1}{t1}(t2))');
hold on;
end
end
After ~2h matlab has crahesd (killed)
Is there another way to plot it?

采纳的回答

Nathan Hardenberg
I think it is not quite clear what your result should be. One of your "doubles"-matrecies is already enough to plot a 3D-Bar plot. What you do is plotting multiple plots in the same figure. If this is your desired solution I don't think it is possible to remove the for-loop.
Still your (wanted solution) should result in a very messy figure. I made a simplified example in the form of your data below. You can see that the bars intersect each other and it is not really good to use as a visualization.
You can check the 'grouped' option in the documentation, which allows different bars at the same position. This would obviously need code adaptation. And on a datasize of yours the bars would probably be very hard to see.
As a tipp, you should create a small example with your data and work with this first, to avoid long loading times.
PS: The bracket "(" in front of cell2mat in your code is to much
N = {{[1,2,3,4,5; 6,7,8,9,10]},
{[1,2,3,4,5; 6,7,8,9,10]*2},
{[1,2,3,4,5; 6,7,8,9,10]*3},
{[1,2,3,4,5; 6,7,8,9,10]*4}};
M = {N};
figure(1); clf; hold on;
Az = (1:1:5);
for t1 = 1:length(M{1})
for t2 = 1:length( M{1}{t1} )
bar3(Az, cell2mat(M{1}{t1}(t2))');
end
end
view([-25.10 33.53])
  7 个评论
CSCh
CSCh 2023-5-4
Thank you very much Nathan for the code, now I just need a workaround for padarray.
Nathan Hardenberg
This should work, instead of the row with the padarray()-function:
A = [A; zeros(maxRows-rowA, colum)];
And remember to accept the answer if you are satisfied.

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(1 个)

CSCh
CSCh 2023-5-5
Works great. Thank you.
  3 个评论
Nathan Hardenberg
I would use the same loop and pad with NaNs:
B = [N{t1}{1}; nan(maxRows-rowA, colum)];
Then store all B matrecies in one 3 dimensional matrix
C = nan(maxRows, colum, 0) % define outside of loop
C(1:maxRows, 1:colum, end+1) = B; % inside of loop
Then just take the mean in the third axis and omit the NaN values.
mean(C,3,"omitnan")
This is not the optimal solution, but should be enough for one calculation.
It is really weird why the data is stored in the way it is when it is useful to take the mean of all values. Just wondering.
CSCh
CSCh 2023-5-9
The data are stored daywise, each day has several amount of data. Thank you.

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Matrix Indexing 的更多信息

产品


版本

R2022b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by