Fit parameter to Weibull distribution

3 次查看（过去 30 天）
Kalle
Kalle 2023-5-4
评论： Jeff Miller 2023-6-4
Hi, i wounder why my customized 3-parametric Weibull distribution function can't fit this specific data but the 2-parametric Weibull distribution function does.
%% INPUT DATA
A = [5.05002673467000 4.03148539861043 5.39815092086792 5.80624039967855 6.40216302871704 5.76023737589518 4.58155600229899 5.00490283966065 6.05405394236247 3.56419595082601 4.50625197092692 6.45612986882528 5.02723805109660 5.93072589238485 5.20658095677694 6.97059233983358 6.17937358220418 4.19038120905558 5.45702393849691 4.59787972768148 2.83733654022217 5.06135972340902 4.45322751998902 3.77954316139221 6.04727951685588 5.98482131958008 4.78870089848836 5.37800931930542 5.78453779220581];
A = A';
%% WEIBULL SETUP
custompdf = @(x,a,b,c) (x>c).*(b/a).*(((x-c)/a).^(b-1)).*exp(-((x-c)/a).^b);
customcdf = @(x,a,b,c) (x>c).*1-exp(-((x-c)/a).^b);
opt = statset('MaxIter',1e5,'MaxFunEvals',1e5,'FunValCheck','off');
params = mle(A,'pdf',custompdf,'start',[mean(A) std(A) min(A)],'Options',opt,'LowerBound',[0 0 -Inf],'UpperBound',[Inf Inf min(A)]);
a = params(1,1);
b = params(1,2);
c = params(1,3);
x = [c+eps(c):0.1:max(A)*4.5];
%% QUANTILES
p = wblfit(A);
[nlogl,pcov] = wbllike(p,A);
[quantile_Wbl2,q95lo,q95up] = wblinv(0.9991666,p(1),p(2),pcov);
Q = quantile(customcdf(x, a, b, c),0.9991666);
quantile_Wbl3 = fsolve(@(x) customcdf(x, a, b, c) - 0.9991666, quantile_Wbl2);
%% FIGURES
plot(x,customcdf(x, a, b, c),'LineWidth',2);
hold on
plot(x,wblcdf(x,p(1),p(2)));
hold on
cdfplot(A);
legend('WBL-3-Parameter','WBL-2-Parameter','daten')
hold off
%% Anpassungstest
% kolmogorov-smirnov Anpassungstest
[h_wbl3,p_wbl3] = kstest(A,[A customcdf(A,a,b,c)],0.05,0);
[h_wbl2,p_wbl2] = kstest(A,[A wblcdf(A,p(1),p(2))],0.05,0);

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Jeff Miller
Jeff Miller 2023-6-3
The problem is a bad choice of starting values. You will get much better parameter estimates with
params = mle(A,'pdf',custompdf,'start',[1 1 1],'Options',opt,'LowerBound',[0 0 -Inf],'UpperBound',[Inf Inf min(A)]);
The 2- and 3-parameter fits are almost identical because the mle estimate of 'c' is pretty close to zero (-0.1464).
  2 个评论
Jeff Miller
Jeff Miller 2023-6-4
You are welcome. If the answer resolves the issue, please 'Accept' it.

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（1 个）

Sandeep
Sandeep 2023-5-23
Hi Kalle,
There can be more than one reason as to why a customized 3-parametric Weibull distribution function may not adequately fit a specific data set while the standard 2-parametric Weibull distribution function does. Firstly, including more parameters in the model can lead to overfitting, which negatively affects the generalization performance of the model. The customized 3-parameter Weibull distribution function may overfit the data, leading to poor predictions in new instances. The customized 3-parameter Weibull distribution function may require more data points to estimate the parameters accurately, leading to poor parameter estimation and sub-optimal results.
In summary, the customized 3-parameter Weibull distribution function may not fit your specific data because it is too complex or you do not have enough data to estimate the parameters accurately, overfitting to random errors, or sub-optimal parameter estimation.

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Weibull Distribution 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by