MISRA violation 10.1 - From stateflow transition if statement generated without explicit comparison

2023 7 25
1 个回答
更新时间：2023 7 26
4 次查看（30 天）

0 个投票

MISRA violation 10.1. From a state transition in stateflow the generetd code results as follow:
if ( bolean_variables)
{ ...
}
else
{...
}
instead
if(TRUE = bolean_variables)
{..
...

请先登录，再回答此问题。

回答（1 个）

Angelo Yeo
Angelo Yeo 2023-7-26

0 个投票

Can you elaborate what your pain point is? Why do you want to follow MISRA Rule 10.1 when your C code is auto-generated?
As you can see in MISRA C:2012 (I am asssuming you are trying to follow MISRA C 2012), Rule 10.1 becomes advisory (not "required" anymore) when it comes to an auto-generated C code.

2 个评论
显示 无 隐藏 无

Francesco
Francesco 2023-7-26
编辑：Francesco 2023-7-26
Yes, you'll right about the MISRA rule but I would like to avoid to write an argumentation for all of these advisory. There are a lot of advisory releted to rule 10.1 ... I was expected to fix it in the model, maybe acting on the code generation settings. If it is possible...
Angelo Yeo
Angelo Yeo 2023-7-26
It's great that you work hard to get rid of all the violations. But in my humble opinion, it's not going to be worked out perfectly as this is an "advisory" rule for auto-generated codes.

请先登录，再进行评论。

类别

在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 MATLAB Coder 的更多信息

产品

标签

提问:

Francesco
Francesco
2023-7-25

评论：

Angelo Yeo
Angelo Yeo
2023-7-26

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by