- trainnet accepts a loss function input, which makes it easier to customize the loss if the standard regression loss is not enough.
- trainnet lets you track additional metrics while training.
- trainnet supports the LBFGS solver, which can converge quickly for small problems
- trainnet outputs a dlnetwork, while trainNetwork outputs a SeriesNetwork or DAGNetwork.
- trainNetwork accepts a table as input, while trainnet does not. This might make trainNetwork slightly easier to use when training data is in a table.
Difference between trainnet and trainNetwork
130 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Hi, I am creating a deep neural network for a regression problem with tabular data as the inputs (6 features and 1 target).
I was wondering if there is any difference between the trainnet and trainNetwork functions? They seem to be quite similar so I am unsure of the pros and cons to using either function?
0 个评论
采纳的回答
Ben Hinkle
2023-12-13
编辑:Ben Hinkle
2023-12-13
Here are some of the differences between the two trainers:
3 个评论
Cris LaPierre
2023-12-15
编辑:Cris LaPierre
2023-12-16
trainnet was introduced in R2023b. You must be using at least R2023b to access it.
Onur Kilic
2024-3-12
Thank you, this is useful information. Should we expect performance improvements for trainnet in the near future? Currently, when training larger models, trainnet is much slower than trainNetwork and also gives 'out of memory' errors (GPU training) for model or minibatch sizes that trainNetwork would handle without issues.
更多回答(0 个)
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!