Array performance in class attributs

14 次查看（过去 30 天）
Franck AUBINEAU
Franck AUBINEAU 2024-2-5
评论： Franck AUBINEAU 2024-2-5
Here is an (short) example of the observed problem. It is not the exact code but it is the exact problem :-)
% Class
classdef MaClasse < handle
properties (Access = public)
tabVal = [];
end
end
% Code, declaration, allocation
pTest = MaClasse();
pTest.tabVal = zeros(200,1000);
tmp = zeros(200,1000);
% Problem
pTest.tabVal(10,:) = ones(1,1000); %
tmp(10,:) = ones(1,1000); % -> twice even more faster than the line above

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Shivam
Shivam 2024-2-5
Hi Franck,
Based on the code you have shared, it seems you want to know the discrepancy in execution time between assigning a matrix of ones to a property of a custom class object and assigning it directly to a standard array.
It is important to know that the observed difference in performance comes from MATLAB's additional processing when dealing with class properties. Whenever you alter a property of a handle class, MATLAB has to conduct extra operations, including managing object references and maintaining the integrity and encapsulation of the data.
And, with a conventional matrix such as tmp, MATLAB can interact with and alter the memory directly, bypassing the complexities introduced by object-oriented features.
I hope it helps in understanding the performance difference between the two lines.
Thanks
  1 个评论
Franck AUBINEAU
Franck AUBINEAU 2024-2-5
Hi and thanks for this answer.
It's exactly what I think but I'm very disapointed by such a difference. I'm using Matlab class in my simulation code and it seems that performance (this example and others like access time in handle cell array) are very slow.

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（0 个）

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Loops and Conditional Statements 的更多信息

标签

产品


版本

R2022b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by