- Statement coverage ensures each line of code is executed at least once, serving as the simplest form of coverage analysis.
- However, it may overlook testing various conditions and decisions within the code, potentially leading to incomplete test coverage.
- Condition coverage necessitates testing each condition in the code to evaluate both its true and false outcomes, ensuring the exploration of different branches.
- However, it may not mandate testing all possible combinations of conditions, potentially leaving some paths untested, especially in complex decisions with multiple conditions.
- MCDC (modified condition/decision coverage) is the most stringent criterion, requiring testing of each condition in both its true and false states and every combination of conditions in each decision.
- It ensures thorough testing of code branches and their interactions, making it highly effective in catching logic errors, but it can be time-consuming and costly to implement.
- If you are only concerned with ensuring that every line of code is executed at least once, then statement coverage is sufficient.
- If you want to make sure that you are testing all the different branches of your code, then CC is a good option.
- If you need the most thorough testing possible and are willing to invest the time and resources, then MCDC is the best choice.