Use of m-scripts in SIMULINK

7 次查看（过去 30 天）
Nitin Skandan
Nitin Skandan 2024-2-20
回答： Mark McBroom 2024-3-4
Ideally it is possible to develop an entire simlink model with embedded m-scripts functions which could be used in place of SIMULINK blocks or STATEFLOW. As per design guidelines which are (recommended i.e. not mandatory) we know that the preferred approach is to use stateflow for modeling flow diagrams/state machines and Simulink blocks for contiuous time parts of the algorithms like PID controllers etc.
My question is: Are there any inherent flaws in developing a model enitirely with embedded m-scripts ?
The MAAB guidelines does not necessarily say something like : Do not use m-script for developing functionality which is more than 60 lines . It only says that one function need to be restricted to 60 lines but there could be any number of sub functions.

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Mark McBroom
Mark McBroom 2024-3-4
There is nothing wrong with using Simulink to architect a system comprised entirely of MATLAB Function blocks. NASA has developed some guidelines for when to use Simuilnk vs. Stateflow vs. MATLAB. See section Appendix 5.1: https://www.mathworks.com/content/dam/mathworks/mathworks-dot-com/solutions/aerospace-defense/standards/FltDyn-CEV-08-148_MATLAB_Standards_v9_20111202.pdf

更多回答（0 个）

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 MAB Modeling Guidelines 的更多信息

标签

产品


版本

R2022b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by