FMCW radar range estimation differences between phased.RangeResponse and fft
显示 更早的评论
I tried to run the following radar simulation, and it succeeded:
Radar simulation [ openExample('driving_radar/AutomotiveRadarInterferenceExample') ]
However, when I try to replace these codes (line 168)
% Define range response
rngresp = phased.RangeResponse('RangeMethod','FFT', ...
'SweepSlope',fmcwwav1.SweepBandwidth/fmcwwav1.SweepTime, ...
'RangeFFTLengthSource','Property','RangeFFTLength',Nrange, ...
'RangeWindow','Hann','SampleRate',fmcwwav1.SampleRate);
% Calculate the range response of interference-free data cube
XrngTgt = rngresp(XcubeTgt);
with this one:
XrngTgt = fftshift(fft(XcubeTgt, Nrange));
the results seem to be different.
After a detailed check, I found that the result of phased.RangeResponse and FFT is different. However, what makes these differences is not described on the official website. Additionally, it is challenging to understand the implementation details in phased.RangeResponse.
Any help or clarification is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
采纳的回答
George
2024-2-27
The main reason why you are see differences is because of the "RangeWindow" being set to Hann in the RangeResponse but not applying that window to the radar data. Also, you need to make sure to fftshift along the correct dimension. Try running the following snippet after running the example:
% Define range response
rngresp = phased.RangeResponse('RangeMethod','FFT', ...
'SweepSlope',fmcwwav1.SweepBandwidth/fmcwwav1.SweepTime, ...
'RangeFFTLengthSource','Property','RangeFFTLength',Nrange, ...
'RangeWindow','Hann','SampleRate',fmcwwav1.SampleRate);
% Need to apply hann window to input (Range Window)
coeff = hann(size(XcubeTgt,1));
input = coeff .* XcubeTgt;
% Compare results
XrngTgtRR = rngresp(XcubeTgt);
XrngTgtFFT = fftshift(fft(in, Nrange),1);
isequal(XrngTgtRR,XrngTgtFFT)
更多回答（0 个）
类别
在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Detection 的更多信息
Translated by 
