I got different outputs from the trained network
3 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Hi all, I already trained a LSTM network and use it to classify the testset. However, the outputs are different when I input the testset samples one by one through for loop and input it as an array. Below is the code:
% Xtest is a 81-1 vector.
% case1: one by one input through for loop
for i = 1:81
testPred_single(i) = classify(LSTM_net,Xtest(i),'SequenceLength','longest');
end
% case2: array input
testPred=classify(LSTM_net,Xtest,'SequenceLength','longest');
Below is the part element of the output variables testPred_single and testPred.
Could anyone explain what causes the gap between this two output variables? Thanks.
2 个评论
Aquatris
2024-7-10
I am by no means an expert but my understanding is, as per definition of LSTM, they are not good when the input data is not a sequence. When you give the inputs individually, you basically remove the sequence information. Hence it comes up with a different output.
采纳的回答
Antoni Woss
2024-7-12
编辑:Antoni Woss
2024-7-12
The differences in the output are coming from the preprocessing applied to your data in the call to minibatchpredict or classify as per the referenced examples. Specifically, the SequencePaddingDirection="left" will append the MiniBatchSize number of inputs with zeros such that the different time dimensions for each observation within the minibatch all have the same total number of time steps. You can find more information about sequence padding on this documentation page: https://uk.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/ug/long-short-term-memory-networks.html#mw_81a7b85b-51dc-4bd7-9bb9-215f473a956f
As a concrete example, the first two entries of XTest have different time lengths.
XTest(1:2)
ans =
2×1 cell array
{127×3 double}
{180×3 double}
So running the minibatchpredict function with a MiniBatchSize=2 and SequencePaddingDirection="left" will add a 53x3 zero matrix to the first entry of XTest so that both observations are of size 180x3.
Running the minibatchpredict with function with a MiniBatchSize=1 will not do any padding and will call predict on the two sequences through the network separately. Therefore, you would expect a difference in the first batch output of the network for these two cases, but not the second (as no padding ever occurs in the second observation for MiniBatchSize=1 or MiniBatchSize=2 as it is the longest sequence).
scoresMiniBatchSize_1 = minibatchpredict(net,XTest,SequencePaddingDirection="left",MiniBatchSize=1);
scoresMiniBatchSize_2 = minibatchpredict(net,XTest,SequencePaddingDirection="left",MiniBatchSize=2);
scoresMiniBatchSize_1(1:2,:)
ans =
2×4 single matrix
0.0000 0.8725 0.0000 0.1274
1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
scoresMiniBatchSize_2(1:2,:)
ans =
2×4 single matrix
0.0000 0.8755 0.0006 0.1239
1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
更多回答(0 个)
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Sequence and Numeric Feature Data Workflows 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!