F-Test Fixed Effects SSRs - reduced model smaller than complete model
3 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Hello! I'm trying to make a modelwide (not individual coefficient specific, like with anova) f-test for my fixed-effects regressions - I can't seem to find a native function in matlab for them so I'm just building them, but if you've got one send it my way. My plan was to do something like the following:
fe_green_money = fitlme(fixed_effects_green_data, 'LogPatents ~ MoneyInvested + Dummy0Patents + (1|Organization)')
fe_green_money_reduced = fitlme(fixed_effects_green_data, 'LogPatents ~ 1 + (1|Organization)')
F_fe_green_money = ((fe_green_money_reduced.SSR - fe_green_money.SSR) / 2) / (fe_green_money.SSR / fe_green_money.DFE);
p_fe_green_money = 1 - fcdf(F_fe_green_money, 2, fe_green_money.DFE)
But I'm running into a problem - fe_green_money_reduced.SSR is smaller (almost 2/3rds the size) than fe_green_money.SSR, which as I understand it should be impossible... Is there an alternate way I should be getting the SSRs or am I doing something wrong or is there another explanation I'm missing?
0 个评论
采纳的回答
Jeff Miller
2024-8-5
SSR is the sum of squares explained by the model (maybe you are thinking it is the sum of squares residual, which is actually called SSE in the fitlme output?).
So, the reduced model explains less of the variance--about 2/3 in your example--exactly as expected. It would be impossible for the reduced model to have a smaller SSE, not SSR.
2 个评论
Jeff Miller
2024-8-5
Sorry, that does look a bit unusual but I can't explain it. Are the parameter estimates nearly identical for all three fits? It seems like they must be (and this is just a little rounding error creeping in somewhere). But it seems quite unlikely that you would get nearly identical parameter estimates for all three datasets.
更多回答(0 个)
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Testing Frameworks 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!