Colon operands must be real scalars
483 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
I tested the following code:
x = rand(1,3);
x([1,2]:[1,2])
In R2024a it gives a warning but it is ok in R2023b! Some existing code that I use relies on this feature. Any reason why it will become an error in the future?
For a better example of how using non-scalar colon operands may be useful:
clear,clc
Params.agejshifter.College=21;
Params.J.College=100-Params.agejshifter.College;
Params.agej.College=1:1:Params.J.College;
Params.J.College=100-Params.agejshifter.College; % Age ends at 100
dj_temp=interp1([0,30,60,65,70,100],[0.00587,0.00116,0.01086,0.01753,0.02785,0.39134],0:1:100,'linear');
Params.sj.College=1-dj_temp((Params.agej.College+Params.agejshifter.College):100);
3 个评论
Image Analyst
2024-9-12
Your example had a 3 element vector
x = rand(1,3);
Which element(s) do you think you want to refer to when you do x([1,2]:[1,2]) ? The first one, second one, third one, or the first and second one (like x(1:2))???
Stephen23
2024-9-12
"Any reason why it will become an error in the future?"
Because it causes plenty of bugs, misleads users, and is trivially replaced with some indexing.
采纳的回答
Walter Roberson
2024-9-12
The colon operator has always been defined as using the first element of each operand.
The change is that soon using non-scalar operands will be an error instead of silently permitted.
Params.sj.College=1-dj_temp((Params.agej.College+Params.agejshifter.College):100);
That code does not create some kind of ragged array indexing from each Params.agej.College+Params.agejshifter.College pair to 100. That code is equivalent to
Params.sj.College=1-dj_temp((Params.agej.College(1)+Params.agejshifter.College(1)):100);
It has always been equivalent to that.
更多回答(1 个)
Steven Lord
2024-9-12
For the expression you gave there are a few possible "reasonable" solutions for what it returns. [But it may not do what you think.]
actual = [1 2]:[1 2]
whatItDoes = 1:1
alternate1 = [1:1 2:2] % Each element of a is "combined" with the corresponding element of b
alternate2 = [1 2:1 2] % 2:1 is empty
But there are other cases where it's difficult to give a reasonable alternative (other than the "just use the first element" approach it's been using for a while.)
actual2 = [1 2]:[1 2 3]
actual3 = [1 2]:[3 999]
In addition, upon reviewing usage of : with non-scalar inputs in MathWorks code we've found that often that usage is a bug!
A = ones(3, 4);
v = 1:size(A)
Did you expect v to be 1:3 or 1:4 or did you expect it somehow to be a combination of those two vectors? If you expected it to be 1:height(A) then you got what you expected; if you expected 1:width(A) or 1:numel(A) you weren't getting what you wanted!
v = 1:size(A, 1)
v = 1:height(A)
v = 1:size(A, 2)
v = 1:width(A)
v = 1:numel(A)
Let's look at your example.
Params.agejshifter.College=21;
Params.J.College=100-Params.agejshifter.College;
Params.agej.College=1:1:Params.J.College;
Params.J.College=100-Params.agejshifter.College; % Age ends at 100
dj_temp=interp1([0,30,60,65,70,100],[0.00587,0.00116,0.01086,0.01753,0.02785,0.39134],0:1:100,'linear');
a = (Params.agej.College+Params.agejshifter.College)
indices = a:100
What exactly were you hoping indices would be when you used it as an index into dj_temp? Did you somehow hope that it would be a collection of vectors, first 22:100 then 23:100 then 24:100 etc.? It is not. So if you thought it was behaving that way, your code has a bug.
0 个评论
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Resizing and Reshaping Matrices 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!