Mismatch between AREAINT and AREAQUAD around (0,0).

2 次查看(过去 30 天)
Dear all,
E_earth = referenceEllipsoid( 'earth' ) ;
lat = [-1, 1] + 0 ; % +0 is placeholder for easy manual shift.
lon = [-1, 1] + 0 ;
areaquad( min(lat), min(lon), max(lat), max(lon), E_earth )
areaint( [min(lat), min(lat), max(lat), max(lat), min(lat), NaN], ...
[max(lon), min(lon), min(lon), max(lon), max(lon), NaN], E_earth )
This outputs:
ans =
4.9234e+10
ans =
7.7333e+10
Their ratio is close to pi/2, and the output of AREAQUAD matches what I get with ArcGIS for example.
Thanks!
Cedric
  1 个评论
Marcus Adkins
Marcus Adkins 2022-4-1
Comparing the results of a 0.02x0.02 (lat/lon) area against STK's computations, you get agreement to 5 significant digits until you hit +/- 1 deg latitude. In that range the Matlab areaInt function is off by as much as 50%

请先登录,再进行评论。

采纳的回答

Amy Haskins
Amy Haskins 2016-1-29
The doc for areaint hints that the accuracy of the function improves with denser sampling. In your you example, you only have the corner points of the quadrangle in the polygon passed to areaint. The function outlinegeoquad can be used to get a more densely sampled boundary of the quadrangle. Using this function, I get answers which are increasing close to that returned by areaquad.
>> E_earth = referenceEllipsoid( 'earth' ) ;
>> [latq,lonq] = outlinegeoquad(lat,lon,0.1,0.1);
>> areaint( latq, lonq, E_earth )
ans =
4.9304e+10
>> [latq,lonq] = outlinegeoquad(lat,lon,0.01,0.01);
>> areaint( latq, lonq, E_earth )
ans =
4.9235e+10
  1 个评论
Cedric
Cedric 2016-1-30
编辑:Cedric 2016-1-30
I see now
"Accuracy of the integration method is inversely proportional to the distance between lat/lon points"
and I hadn't realized that a 2deg difference around the origin would be troublesome when it isn't elsewhere.
Thank you very much!

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(0 个)

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by