why ezplot(f,[3000,4000]) would not work
1 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Hi all,
I have this next function which is the result of solving for Px in my code
f=@(Px) (16*(-(((27*Px)/2 - 65625)*((27*Px)/2 + 65625))/4)^(1/2))/27;
the problem is that when I use the ezplot(f,[3000,5000]) it will plot wrong plot. However, if I use
ezplot((16*(-(((27*Px)/2 - 65625)*((27*Px)/2 + 65625))/4)^(1/2))/27,[3000,5000])
the curve will be correct. Please if you have any suggestion to solve this issue advise me.
Thanks
Aziz
2 个评论
John D'Errico
2016-2-28
No. Actually, the result that you claim does work, will fail in MATLAB.
ezplot((16*(-(((27*Px)/2 - 65625)*((27*Px)/2 + 65625))/4)^(1/2))/27,[3000,5000])
Undefined function or variable 'Px'.
I think you have things confused.
回答(1 个)
Walter Roberson
2016-2-28
Your second form relies upon whatever Px happens to be in memory, and will fail if Px is not a scalar.
Possibly what you meant to post was
ezplot('(16*(-(((27*Px)/2 - 65625)*((27*Px)/2 + 65625))/4)^(1/2))/27',[3000,5000])
When I try that, the output is identical to plotting with your f anonymous function.
When I use your f anonymous function, ezplot gives a warning about f not being vectorized. You can remove that by vectorizing it:
f=@(Px) (16*(-(((27*Px)/2 - 65625).*((27*Px)/2 + 65625))/4).^(1/2))/27;
The output is the same exactly as for the non-vectorized version, and the same exactly as for the string version.
2 个评论
Walter Roberson
2016-2-28
In R2014a on OS-X I get a curve for all three versions. Which MATLAB version are you using?
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!