GPU performance with short vectors

Hello - I see GPU computation underperforming when used for vector manipulation with short lengths.
>> a = rand(1000000, 100,'gpuArray');
>> b= gather(a);
>> tic; for i=1:100 ; eval('q = zeros(1000000,1);for i = 1:100; q = b(:,i)+q;end') ; end;doc
Elapsed time is 45.489811 seconds.
>>tic; for i=1:100 ; eval('qq = zeros(1000000,1);for i = 1:100; q = a(:,i)+q;end') ; end;toc
Elapsed time is 0.875140 seconds.
same when done for short vectors see GPU computation under performing:
>> a = rand(200, 100,'gpuArray');
>>b= gather(a);
>> tic; for i=1:100 ; eval('q = zeros(200,1);for i = 1:100; q = b(:,i)+q;end') ; end;doc
Elapsed time is 0.021727 seconds.
>>tic; for i=1:100 ; eval('qq = zeros(200,1);for i = 1:100; q = a(:,i)+q;end') ; end;toc
Elapsed time is 0.833865 seconds.
Any insight will be appreciated.
Thank you.

 采纳的回答

Computation in a GPU core is significantly slower than in a modern CPU core. It makes up for that by having a lot of them - thousands. If you don't give it thousands of things to do at once, you're never going to beat the CPU.
In your simple computation above you are unnecessarily using a loop. This may have been for illustrative purposes, but if it reflects your actual code, you will gain back your performance by removing the loop, i.e.
q = sum(a, [], 2);

更多回答(1 个)

Do not use eval() for this. use timeit()

3 个评论

... and for GPU timings, use gputimeit.
Thank you for your insight. time and gputimeit gives very similar results and shows similar trend where smaller vector(a & b above) had worse run performance when run on GPU.

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

帮助中心File Exchange 中查找有关 GPU Computing 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by