Operation without for loop

I have two matrix.MAtrix A(250000x4)and MAtrix B(250000x4)
I have a function which result a scalar C.
C = myfunction(X,Y);
Now i want to pass each row of MAtrixA and MAtrixB to myfunction without using a for loop.
How to do it ?

 采纳的回答

Y = arrayfun(@(i1)myfunction(A(i1,:), B(i1,:)), 1:size(A,1))

3 个评论

That's what I was thinking.
Now... can it be done with bsxfun() ? ;-)
Sure. Permute B so that it is [1x4x250000].
bsxfun(@myFunction,A,permute(B,[3 2 1]));
It's going to use a ton of memory and probably be slower though. Of course, it's still awesomer because it uses bsxfun( :-).
Thanks all for the input, i used andrei method. It seems to be working but havent check its performance of against for loop.

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(1 个)

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2012-1-31

0 个投票

You can make it look prettier using arrayfun(), but arrayfun() is just going to be doing the "for" loop internally.

4 个评论

is arrayfun() is faster than for loop ? I tried with arrayfun but arrayfun in passing one element of matrix A and one element of matrix B, not the whole row of matrix A and matrix B .
fh = @(x,y)(myfunction(x, y));
[Y]=arrayfun(fh, A,B,'UniformOutput',false)
I would not expect arrayfun() to be faster than a "for" loop. Your initial question was, however, not about performance; it was about applying the operation without using a "for" loop.
yeh, i wanted something which would be faster than for loop, otherwise i would have done with for loop :)
Often in such cases the best thing to do is rewrite the function so that it accepts arrays.
Note that "for" loops are not necessarily slow, especially in new versions. There is probably more overhead in calling myfunction all those times than there is in the "for" loop itself.

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

帮助中心File Exchange 中查找有关 Loops and Conditional Statements 的更多信息

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by