清空筛选条件
清空筛选条件

How would you draw this in MATLAB?

1 次查看（过去 30 天）
S. David
S. David 2012-3-4
Hi,
I have an equation for the absorption coefficient in underwater acoustic communication channel (UWA) as:
alpha=0.11.*(f.^2./(1+f.^2))+44.*(f.^2./(4100+f))+2.75*10^-4.*f.^2+0.003;
where f is the frequency in kHz, and the absorption coefficient is given by dB/Km. I have a paper that plots this relation versus the frequency. It is straightforward as it appears at first, but when I tried to do it myself I have not gotten the same curve, even though the vertical axis in the paper is in dB/Km, which means it is just a direct substitution in the above equation. The question is why?
Thanks in advance
  3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论
Rick Rosson
Rick Rosson 2012-3-4
Please post your MATLAB code.
Jan
Jan 2012-3-4
All we know is the formula and that you do not get the "same curve". It might be a typo in the formula, another scaling of log-scaling, different colors or line styles, a post-script problem in the paper, etc. I do not see a chance to guess the source of the differences yet. Please post the necessary details.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

回答（4 个）

S. David
S. David 2012-3-5
This is my code:
clear all;
clc;
f=10^3.*(0:1000);
alpha=(0.11.*((f.^2)./(1+f.^2))+44.*(f.^2./(4100+f))+(2.75.*10^(-4)).*(f.^2)+0.003);
plot(f,alpha)
The figure is Fig 1 at http://www.mit.edu/~millitsa/resources/pdfs/bwdx.pdf
Thanks
Jan
Jan 2012-3-5
Unfortunately you still did not describe, which difference you mean. I guess it is the small wobble near to 60Hz.
When I read the explanation about the Figure 1 in this paper, I find at first the above formula and then:
This formula is generally valid for frequencies above a
few hundred Hz. For lower frequencies, the following
formula may be used:
10 log a(f) = 0.002+ 0.11*(f.^2 ./ (1 + f.^2)) + 0.011 * f.^2
I guess, that the author used this formula for the low frequency part.
[EDITED] Check your formula again. It is "4100+f.^2" instead of "4100+f".
  4 个评论
显示 2更早的评论
S. David
S. David 2012-3-5
Not much difference when I wrote f.^2 instead of f. Now, I need the program to work. Later I can consider more efficient one.
Jan
Jan 2012-3-5
Ok, not much, but at least enough?
I suggest the standard notation of numbers mainly, because this is faster to write and to read. This is more important than the runtime.

请先登录，再进行评论。

G A
G A 2012-3-5
This gives the same picture as in the paper:
clear;
f=0:1000;%kHz
alpha=0.11.*f.^2./(1+f.^2)+44.*f.^2./(4100+f.^2)+2.75e-4.*f.^2+0.003;%dB/km
figure(1)
clf
plot(f,alpha,'-b')
  3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论
G A
G A 2012-3-5
multiplying f-array by 1e3 is not necessary
Honglei Chen
Honglei Chen 2012-3-5
In your original question, it says f is in kHz so that's why you don't need to multiply 1e3.

请先登录，再进行评论。

Saed
Saed 2012-3-5
That is great. What did you do? I mean I tried all of these stuff. Anyway, it is fine now. Thanks a lot.
  2 个评论
G A
G A 2012-3-5
1)I have used equation given in the paper. Jan has spotted your mistake. 2)I have removed frequency multiplication by 1e3 you have done.

请先登录，再进行评论。

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 MATLAB 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by